Hi David,
You may still want to make sure that you can give priority to interrupts.
The single work queue will tend to mix them all together. As far as I
can see anyway.
Phil Wilshire
David Wooff wrote:
Yes, it is safe. See kernel/workqueue.c:
queue_work -> queue_work_on -> __queue_work -> spin_lock_irqsave
Best regards,
Daniel
Ah, I see now! I should examine the code a bit more readily in future.
Many thanks.
This electronic transmission is strictly confidential and intended solely for
the addressee(s). If you are not the intended addressee, you must not disclose,
copy or take any action in reliance of this email. If you have received this
email in error please notify the sender as soon as possible. Any views
expressed within this email may not necessarily be the views held by Calrec
Audio Ltd. Calrec Audio Ltd have taken measures to ensure this email is free
from computer viruses, however it is recommended that you also employ
anti-virus measures on your computer systems.
Calrec Audio Ltd. Registered in England. Registration number: 02392336. WEEE
registration number: WEE/JE0051TQ/PRO. Registered address: Nutclough Mill,
Hebden Bridge, West Yorks, HX7 8EZ.
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
