Hi Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:19:43AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:29:50AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
[...]
+#else
+#define TASK_SIZE (0xFFFFFFFFUL)
+#endif
Because of do_getname() :
len = TASK_SIZE - (unsigned long) filename;
we should rather have
#define TASK_SIZE (0x100000000ull)
I see what you mean. But in practice here I don't think it matters.
Can no process have its stack allocated in the last block, and hence have some
argv[i] put in the last addresses, with the terminating '\0' at 0xffffffff ?
I think that is possible. But the "in practice" part is that
I don't know of any m68knommu platforms that actually map the RAM
right at the very top of the 32bit address space - so that it ends
at 0xffffffff.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: g...@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
