On 08/06/12 10:05, Steven King wrote:
On Wednesday 06 June 2012 8:57:34 pm Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 07/06/12 07:02, Steven King wrote:
use MCF_IRQ_PIT1 instead of MCFINT_VECBASE + MCFINT_PIT1 so we can
support those parts that have the pit1 interrupt on other than the first
interrupt controller.

Signed-off-by: Steven King<sfk...@fdwdc.com>

Looks good. Applied to for-next branch of m68knommu git tree.


Did you push this to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gerg/m68knommu.git? its not
showing up when I pull.  Or is there different tree I should be pulling from?

No, I hadn't pushed it up to kernel.org yet. But it is there now.

Regards
Greg



------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     g...@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close                             FAX:         +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to