On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:01:20PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 07/06/12 00:20, Steven King wrote:
> >>Ok, done. I had a merge conflict on Kconfig.cpu, but I thinked I > >>fixed it up right. > >Yeah, I ran into that conflict too when I rebased my trees; curious, I > >looked > >at the log and that ARCH_HAVE_CUSTOM_GPIO_H was added by Mark Brown, and from > >the commit message it sounds like removing it as you did may break whatever > >it was he was intending. (cc'ing Mark). > Relooking at it you may be right. It still compiles for coldfire > the way I did it. Wasn't sure if it only made sense to have > ARCH_HAVE_CUSTOM_GPIO_H if you also had ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB on. > In any, I have changed the patch on for-next to leave the > ARCH_HAVE_CUSTOM_GPIO_H in place. It does no harm being there. The goal of the patch is to allow architectures using gpiolib to provide an asm/gpio.h, without defining the symbol your asm/gpio.h should be ignored by gpiolib.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ uClinux-dev mailing list uClinux-dev@uclinux.org http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org To unsubscribe see: http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
