Hi Greg,
Greg Ungerer wrote,

> Hi Angelo,
> 
> On 20/04/16 04:14, angelo wrote:
> > infinite thanks.
> > 
> > Do you maybe have also the
> > gcc-5.3.0-fix-libgcc-build.patch ?
> 
> Yep, attached.

Can you explain why this patch is required and why
the atomic code failes to compile?
Do you mind to add some notes/comments to 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53833

There is another workaround in your script:
     find ${GCCLIB} -name libgcc.a -print | while read t
        do
                ${TARGET}-ar dv "$t" _ctors.o
        done

What kind of pain this is causing?

Both works fine for me and the second workaround
is simpler than my old way via a extra gcc spec file
and a gcc-wrapper script.

best regards
 Waldemar
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev

Reply via email to