Awesome, these are great answers. What's the timeframe on 1.1M4? And
for 1.1.0? I was going to do a bit of a 'marketing' push for GeoServer
1.3.0, but didn't manage to really get to it. Perhaps I could do it for
udig 1.1.0 + GeoServer 1.3.1 or something... We could go for a few
articles in publications that highlight how well they can work together.
Would be great to get a mapbuilder 1.0.0 as well, promote our whole
little stack at once... Not sure on their timing for 1.0 though.
Chris
On 2/22/06, Cory Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Holmes wrote:
>
> > Hey all, I'm trying out the SLD editor and export. It looks like
> > great work, but it seems as if the exported sld is still not fully
> > valid? I get a few errors (posted below). In GeoServer we just fully
> > validate with xerces against the schema.
> >
> > Of course since we're using all the same code as you, if we don't
> > fully validate things work fine - I was successfully able to make a
> > pastel map of US unemployment, upload the new style to GeoServer and
> > view it, which was pretty cool indeed. But had to not check 'fully
> > validate SLD', since if I did it got errors. Are there plans to
> > produce fully valid SLD?
> >
> > Either way in the 1.3.1 release I'm hoping to put in good sections
> > pointing to udig as the way to edit SLD. It's really some great work.
> > Would be a great capability to show off in one of your walkthroughs as
> > well, if it's not already there.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I've been fixing SLD errors as I find them. Last week I successfully
> exported from uDig into GeoServer sans errors, but different situations
> reveal new bugs in the SLDTransformer code.
>
> I believe I fixed the bugs listed a week or two ago -- so you could try
> out a nightly build or wait for 1.1.M4 :)
>
> > When I hit the 'simple' tab on the SLD editor I get nothing at all.
> > Is that right? The thing that would make sense to me is to put the
> > 'change style' stuff in the simple tab of the SLD editor, and to
> > rename the 'sld editor' to 'change style'. Is that's what is planned?
>
> Yes -- the code for the simple tab wasn't written in time for M3. It is
> now implemented... and the it's been renamed to "Change Style..."
>
> > Second, is there any plan for min/max scale denominator support?
> > That's definitely one of the most requested SLD things on the
> > GeoServer side of the fence, so tons of features don't render when
> > zoomed out.
>
> Andrea added this about 10 days ago :)
>
> Thanks for testing this!!
>
> Cheers,
> Cory.
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Holmes
n:Holmes;Chris
org:The Open Planning Project
adr:;;377 Broadway, 11th Floor;New York;NY;10013;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:VP, Strategic Development
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://topp.openplans.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
