Nothing that thought out actually. I'm just going to be doing a push on
GeoServer, and it'd be nice to point out good, stable clients that are
known to work with GeoServer. At this point I don't really want to push
the integrated GIS suite of tools.
Don't modify for release dates for our 'business case', but I would
advise you get the 1.0.0 release out sooner rather than later. It's
unglamorous work, but it's the most important from the perspective of
users. And note that for coordination with GeoServer you need to
release it with some lead time for us to integrate the latest.
Chris
Shorter, Cameron wrote:
Chris,
Could you please expand on your marketing ideas here.
Are you suggesting that Geoserver/Udig/Mapbuilder coordinate our releases
and put out a joint publicity statement?
This sounds like the first steps toward an integrated GIS suite of tools.
Mapbuilder has not made a commitment for a 1.0 release date yet (we are just
about to release 1.0rc2) but we could potentially set a release date within
2 to 4 weeks if there was a strong business case (and support) to do so.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chris Holmes
Sent: Thursday, 23 February 2006 5:52 AM
To: User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS; mapbuilder
Subject: [Mapbuilder-devel] Re: [udig-devel] SLD export not
fully valid?
Awesome, these are great answers. What's the timeframe on
1.1M4? And for 1.1.0? I was going to do a bit of a
'marketing' push for GeoServer 1.3.0, but didn't manage to
really get to it. Perhaps I could do it for udig 1.1.0 +
GeoServer 1.3.1 or something... We could go for a few
articles in publications that highlight how well they can
work together.
Would be great to get a mapbuilder 1.0.0 as well, promote
our whole little stack at once... Not sure on their timing
for 1.0 though.
Chris
On 2/22/06, Cory Horner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Holmes wrote:
>
> > Hey all, I'm trying out the SLD editor and export. It
looks like > > great work, but it seems as if the exported
sld is still not fully > > valid? I get a few errors
(posted below). In GeoServer we just fully > > validate
with xerces against the schema.
> >
> > Of course since we're using all the same code as you, if
we don't > > fully validate things work fine - I was
successfully able to make a > > pastel map of US
unemployment, upload the new style to GeoServer and > > view
it, which was pretty cool indeed. But had to not check
'fully > > validate SLD', since if I did it got errors. Are
there plans to > > produce fully valid SLD?
> >
> > Either way in the 1.3.1 release I'm hoping to put in
good sections > > pointing to udig as the way to edit SLD.
It's really some great work.
> > Would be a great capability to show off in one of your
walkthroughs as > > well, if it's not already there.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I've been fixing SLD errors as I find them. Last week I
successfully > exported from uDig into GeoServer sans
errors, but different situations > reveal new bugs in the
SLDTransformer code.
>
> I believe I fixed the bugs listed a week or two ago -- so
you could try > out a nightly build or wait for 1.1.M4 :) >
> > When I hit the 'simple' tab on the SLD editor I get
nothing at all.
> > Is that right? The thing that would make sense to me is
to put the > > 'change style' stuff in the simple tab of the
SLD editor, and to > > rename the 'sld editor' to 'change
style'. Is that's what is planned?
>
> Yes -- the code for the simple tab wasn't written in time
for M3. It is > now implemented... and the it's been
renamed to "Change Style..."
>
> > Second, is there any plan for min/max scale denominator support?
> > That's definitely one of the most requested SLD things
on the > > GeoServer side of the fence, so tons of features
don't render when > > zoomed out.
>
> Andrea added this about 10 days ago :) > > Thanks for
testing this!!
>
> Cheers,
> Cory.
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) >
http://udig.refractions.net >
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
DISCLAIMER:---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Email may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is intended
solely for the addressee(s) named. If you have received this information in error, or
are advised that you have been posted this Email by accident, please notify the
sender by return Email, do not redistribute it, delete the Email and keep no copies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Chris Holmes
The Open Planning Project
thoughts at: http://cholmes.wordpress.com
begin:vcard
fn:Chris Holmes
n:Holmes;Chris
org:The Open Planning Project
adr:;;377 Broadway, 11th Floor;New York;NY;10013;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:VP, Strategic Development
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://topp.openplans.org
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
