On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:26 -0700, Jesse Eichar wrote: > No. This is expected. I didn't bother adding those because they > aren't actually necessary for the SDK they were just nice because the > SDK could be an application or an SDK. But since I wasn't able to > completely finish the SDK I didn't take the time to do that as well. > The SDK should still do its SDK job. It just isn't a stand-alone > uDig right now.
Well, eclipse started complaining when I tried launching an app using the SDK. Perhaps my configuration is wrong, but the easiest way to fix things was to add all the pieces to the udigSDK/ dir. --adrian _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
