Agree! On Tuesday 05 October 2010 08:45:45 pm Jesse Eichar wrote: > > > Pros: > > > - we have a new feature (wmt) > > > > That one needs some love (see my other email) and testing. > > Agreed. > > > > - we have a new built process to try out (git) > > > - we have transitioned to GeoTools 2.7, and a release of GeoTools 2.7 > > > has > > > > been made recently that we can use without any extra effort > > > > with the new new packaging choice I am finally bringing the grass > > raster format support in udig. I am quite there (for that one I > > already had the necessary votes) for grass format, netcdf might take > > another while due to the imageio-ext problems I didn't figure out yet. > > I also would like to bring the new advanced style editors in the core > > of udig. What do you think? > > Sounds good to me
-- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
