Hello, your comment have persuaded me. I think we should try github a couple of month. To avoid a big lost we could maintain some snapshots (tags) in other site.
cheers On Tuesday 22 February 2011 05:22:33 am Severin (aka Cliff) wrote: > +1 GitHub > > From my readings and experience playing with both GitHub and Gitorious. I > like GitHub because it: > - Has better documentation; > - Plays well with clients other then CLI git; > - Appears more mature and seems to stay ahead of Gitorious in regard to > conforming to the current git spec (see smart http); > - Nice project tracker; > - Nice issue tracker; > - The Wiki looks nice but I haven't had a chance to play with its editor as > yet; > - Promotes discussion, mentoring and social interaction see: > https://github.com/jquery/jquery/pull/228 > > Good for new people, good for developers, good for documentation > contributors, promotes community... Would provide a place to centralise the > uDig development and documentation. The integration of task and issue > tracking with the project code repo is neat and tidy. Not to mention the > uDig wiki is versioned as its committed into and generated from the project > repo. > > In the end, what I care about is stability for the uDig community. > > As such, the requirements are a service that: > - is guaranteed to be there for quite a few years; > - provides a stable home for the uDig project; > - continues updating and upgrading itself to support changes in the Git > protocol; > - provides tools to help manage the project; > - is intuitive with great documentation to help new starters get onboard. -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
