Comments below.

2011/8/5 Jody Garnett <[email protected]>

>  I also raised this; my take was we should be careful to keep the "product"
> changes a bit more internal - so 1.3. And to save changing the version
> number to 2.0 when we have something to show for it (i.e. to normal users).
>
We don't have to change to eu.udig now if you don't want to Moovida.
>

The change to eu.udig is not required, removing it from the RFC is no
problem. If we aim for the minor version change to 1.3, that will be the
correct thing to do. So, I will remove it from the RFC (I have no strong
opinions about this)


>
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Friday, 5 August 2011 at 3:39 PM, andrea antonello wrote:
>
> Hi Kenneth,
> I am abroad so I can't get much into details. I have just one concern.
> Are you sure refactoring to eu.udig is safe?
> There are so many places wheer ids are used as string and package
> names and who only knows what more :)
>
> It looks a such large scale move to me that I then would also add
> migration to eclipse 4 :)
>
> Good work anyways,
> Andrea
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi list!
> I have now updated the RFC proposal to reflect my posts, IRC chats and
> comments from the list, and I think it is good enough to be voted upon by
> the PMC and committers. So far, I have received positive feedback from
> Andrea (moodiva), Jody and Jesse.
> Since this RFC propose major (and overdue) changes to how uDig persist
> model
> resources, all uDig projects from version 1.2.2 and backwards will be
> broken. To remedy this, an uDig project import method is proposed, allowing
> old projects to be (automatically) converted and imported into the new
>  persistence framework.
> Be aware that if the RFC is approved, all community plug-ins will be
> affected because:
>
> uDig model will be refactored to eu.udig.* which breaks any existing
> dependencies on model objects
> Plug-ins depending on non-standard EMF behavior of current models will be
> broken after the change
>
> As a result, all maintainers of community plug-ins are encouraged to read
> this RFC and give their feedback (and vote, even if they are not a PMC
> member or committer). This will help the PMC to make the best possible
> decision.
> Cheers,
> Kenneth
> 2011/8/4 Kenneth Gulbrandsoy <[email protected]>
>
>
> Hi folks!
> I'm back on a decent internet connection, and have some e-mail reading and
> writing to do. Anyways, see comments below.
>
> 2011/7/28 Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
>
>
> I am looking forward to the updated proposal.
>
>
> I'm willing to do much of this work after my summer vacation, hopefully
> with the support of the PMCs and Jesse in particular.
>
>
> Kill maim destroy.  We might have to rename this to uDig 2.0 because it
> will break extensions but I think this is a long overdue.
>
>
>
> You could also rename the packages to eu.udig and make moovida happy (and
> me happy as well for consistency).
>
>
> Do you mean  the *.project *.printing model packages? I think that is an
> excellent idea.
>
>
> More seriously if we are going to take on a whack of instability I would
> like to keep the window short; I don't think we can be quick enough to set
> this up as a code sprint topic for foss4g.
>
>
> I agree. A code sprint would be really nice. I'm plan to attend the sprint
> on IRC (if all goes to plan, I will attend foss4g next year).
>
>
> However I would like to be organised; be able to pass on a warning to my
> project managers and generally co-ordinate resources to make this
> efficient.
>
>
> Sure. Any preferences on how to do this? I will read up on how the code
> sprint is organized. Where can I start writing up a code sprint topic for
> foss4g?
>
>
> Jody
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
> Kenneth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
Kenneth
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to