> I just tried to build from sources and I'm wondering about several things:
> - the version of bundles are different, from 1.2.0 to 1.2.2 and 1.3.0
> is everything to find.
>
>
We are only supposed to change version number when we change the plugin; this
way plugins that people
write that depend on a specific version of net.refractions.udig.catalog can be
sure of working.
We do this to follow the eclipse rules.
Cliff tells me I am supposed to make the pom.xml and MANIFEST.MF version
numbers match; it could be I have missed one (if so that is just a mistake on
my part).
> In other projects like geotools the versions
> are in every module and submodule the same.
>
>
GeoTools is doing its own thing here; it is not strictly correct. In earlier
releases of GeoTools we allowed each module to have its own version number and
to be treated as an individual project.
> Can somebody explain, what the bundle net.refractions.udig.libs.source
> is for.
>
>
It bundles up the geotools source jars and contributes them into the Eclipse
IDE. This is included in the uDig SDK so that people can step through geotools
code when doing a training course.
> The sources, if available, can be copied with the
> maven-dependencies-plugin by using classifier configuration. The
> section in pom-libs.xml could look like this and was taken from the
> already existing section but added the classifier element:
>
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
None at this time; looks like you are trying to replace the last couples uses
of refresh xml?
I do have a question - for Jesse.
Right now the terra data plugin has its own libs directory; could we remove
this now that you are out of RnD mode? I have just made an sample uDig 1.3.1
for testing; and I think it has the wrong version of your datastore.
Jody
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
