Hi Paul, my +1 come from the heart. I have been thinking about and wishing this for much too long now.
>From the RFC I do not understand how you want to handle this exactly? Let's for example take a shapefile (it is a good move to start with that one). Some fields will have documents, as for example pictures of the single feature. Will the document view let the user define a field that holds documents? The wireframe you created shows a lot of documents, I am a bit confused. Ciao, Andre On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Paul Pfeiffer <[email protected]> wrote: > Can I please get committee members to have a look at this RFC and vote. > http://udig.refractions.net/confluence/display/UDIG/Document+View > > I have begun work in my own fork and as part of this I have run into the > following issue > https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/UDIG-1867 > > Cheers > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > _______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
