> > Um - Hi Andrew - I think we were waiting to hear back from you and your 
> > team? As I understand you were away Dec / Jan so I did not want to pester 
> > :-)
> >  
> Jody,
>  
> Yes that's right. In addition to being away in December, my mandate has been 
> to prioritize the Long Term Support (http://wiki.eclipse.org/LTS) industry 
> working group (IWG) before Location. It's developing nicely so I'm picking up 
> on tasks for the Location IWG. I've been quietly recruiting companies and 
> people who would be interested in Location as well. Thank you for joining the 
> mailing list.
>  
> For Location, as per the Eclipse bylaws, we need permission to distribute 
> software that's not EPL. Even if uDig were to re-license under the EPL (or 
> dual-license EPL/LGPL), Geotools (which is LGPL) and other dependencies would 
> still require permission. For this reason, we need the Location IWG. The 
> Polarsys industry working group at Eclipse has set a successful precedent 
> here.
>  
> Getting companies & interested people to join the Location IWG mailing list 
> is something everyone can help with. Thank you kindly.  
>  
> In terms of next steps and timing... we're aiming for a face to face meeting 
> in May, likely at the Location Intelligence conference in Washington D.C. 
> Between then and now, we home to prime the pump for discussion of initiatives 
> and iterate a draft of the Location IWG charter.
>  
> From a uDig perspective, once the Location IWG is launched, and of course if 
> we receive Refractions support on this, we can formally begin the proposal to 
> take it to Eclipse. This feels like it'll happen around June/July timeframe. 
> How does this work for you all?
It sounds great; and since we are new to the eclipse world we will heavily lean 
on your experience / direction.

Refractions is alive (and have continued to keep the serves operational; 
however they have not responded to any project specific emails). As such I 
expect we will need to try phoning; when we have a nice clear plan laid out to 
discuss?

I am likely to proceed with the EPL change request regardless of the status on 
the location IWG as it will help simplify our story.

With that in mind I expect the only plugin to contain an LGPL license will be 
net.refractions.udig.libs. There are a couple of experiments Frank was working 
on to allow us to depend on the GeoTools jars directly; but the details got 
technical for me … and I should not plan with them in mind.

Jody  

_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel

Reply via email to