On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Paul Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> I never noticed the dcp2icc utility. Which is very cool. However, I just >>>> tried it with the EOS 400D, and the images don't match at all with >>>> camera generated images. The images are _very_ contrastless... >>>> >>>> >>> I've got same results with profiles for 5D. _very_ contrastless >>> >>> Still looking for working profiles. >>> >> >> Wait, this could be very intentional... Since you can increase contrast >> in UFRaw, using either the contrast slider, or by applying a curve... >> >> > Straight out of the camera, plain raw images should look a little flat. > This is why you shoot raw, so you can apply specific tone curves and > adjustments to make the image look just how you want.
Well a little would be quite the understatement... > It should not be expected that a de-bayered, but otherwise unprocessed, > raw image will look like the camera jpeg. Yes, of course... Part of that processing _can_ be in the profile... > If a _camera_ profile is really making images "pop", then maybe the > profile is doing more than it should be doing? Well, I wonder... Since profiles can apply curves... I wonder if images in Lightroom look this flat and unamazing when you open them by default. Or does Lightroom apply a default curve...? Regards, Pascal de Bruijn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
