Hi Ashok,

The output below is from the lint target.  It looks like the nightly
has completed successfully.  What exactly was the problem with the
build?

What are the nightly options you used?  Can you attach the
environment file you used?

> how to clean? and how to give fresh build?

Running nightly again will clean up the area and do a fresh build by
default.  You need to use the "-i" flag explicitly to avoid this and
do an incremental build.

Cheers,
Venky.

On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:44:24AM +0530, Ashok Kumar wrote:
> hi,
> 
> i had a problem on compiling ON sources on solaris 10. i used sunstudio 10
> compiler tools.
> it ran for 6 to 7 hours, after that system was idle.
> so i opened the log.. this was the message. i didn't get the mail from build
> process.
> the total nightly log file is 57MB in size, so i am attaching some last 100
> lines..
> 
> 
> ****************************************************************************
> 
> debug32/kb8042: (library construction):
> Solaris --> 2 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> /export/testws/usr/src/uts/i86pc/pci-ide
> Solaris --> 1 job
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/pci-ide.ln
> 
> debug64/pci-ide: (library construction):
> Solaris --> 1 job
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug32/pci-ide.ln
> 
> debug32/pci-ide: (library construction):
> Solaris --> 2 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> /export/testws/usr/src/uts/i86pc/ata
> Solaris --> 1 job
> Solaris --> 2 jobs
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_queue.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_debug.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_scsi.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_scsa.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_dma.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_timer.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ata_blacklist.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_waitq.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ghd_gcmd.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ata_common.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ata_disk.ln
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/ata_dma.ln
> Solaris --> 2 jobs
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/atapi.ln
> Solaris --> 3 jobs
> Solaris --> Job output
> 
> debug64/atapi_fsm.ln
> Solaris009D4D    -                 gbk
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D4E    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D4F    -                 big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D50    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D51    0x00009D54        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D55    -                 gbk
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D56    0x00009D5D        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D5E    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D5F    0x00009D61        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D62    0x00009D66        gbk
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D67    0x00009D6C        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D6D    0x00009D6E        hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D6F    0x00009D75        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D76    -                 gbk
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D77    0x00009D79        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7A    -                 gbk
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7B    -                 big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7C    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7D    -                 big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7E    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D7F    0x00009D82        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D83    -                 hkscs
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D84    0x00009D8C        big5
> MapCode2Font    0x00009D8D    0x00009D8F
> ==== Nightly build noise ====
> 
> 
> ==== Nightly build noise ====
> 
> ************************************************************************************************
> 
> can any one guess, what is this problem...
> 
> suggest me to proceed.
> 
> how to clean? and how to give fresh build?
> 
> 
> thanks
> 
> Ashok


Reply via email to