Peace continues to elude us -- was independence worth fighting for?

 

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com.
http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015  

\----------------------------------------------------------/

 

Angolans Come Home to 'Negative Peace'
July 30, 2003
By LYDIA POLGREEN
M'BANZA CONGO, Angola - The journey took only a few hours -
a brisk, bumpy ride of 60 miles in the bed of a truck along
a rutted, red dirt road. It was a nanosecond compared with
the five years that Emmanuel Antonio, his wife and six
children had spent as refugees across the border in Congo.
This was the ride home. As the convoy bounced along, Mr.
Antonio's older children slumbered at his feet, oblivious
to the bone-rattling bumps, and his 32-year-old wife,
Madelena Merneza, cradled their youngest, Dani, 2, in her
arms.
Finally setting foot again on Angolan soil, in the border
town of Luvo, and waiting in line for a stamp from
immigration officials, Mr. Antonio searched the moment for
joy. He found only worry.
"My family must come home because we are Angolans," said
Mr. Antonio, 38, a farmer. "Now we have peace. We can only
hope that there will be peace until the end."
The civil war, which killed at least half a million
Angolans and displaced more than a third of this country's
13 million people, has been over for more than a year.
Since then, more than a million people like Mr. Antonio
have returned to a country physically, politically and
economically in ruins.
Their return is perhaps the clearest sign yet that the
worst of Angola's troubles are over. But relief officials
warn that some of Angola's biggest challenges may still lie
ahead.
"People will discover their homes have been destroyed,
roads are gone, schools are gone; very little is here,"
said Asfaha Bemnet, the United Nations official charged
with overseeing the repatriation effort in M'banza Congo,
about 200 miles northeast of Luanda, the capital. "What we
are telling the returnees is, `Look, you are not returning
to the land of milk and honey. But it is your home and it
is good to go back. So roll up your sleeves, get to work
and help rebuild your country.' "
There is much to do. Last month the United Nations began
bringing home the 400,000 refugees who remained in Congo,
Namibia and Zambia.
The repatriation, which is voluntary, is a slow and complex
process, impeded by bad roads, broken bridges and thousands
of land mines.
The refugees return to a country where, according to the
United Nations, 80 percent of people have no access to
basic medical care. More than two-thirds have no running
water. A whole generation of children has never opened a
schoolbook. Life expectancy is less than 40 years. Three in
ten children will die before reaching their fifth birthday.
In this fertile land where fields have lain fallow because
of land mines sown liberally across the countryside, more
than a million people need help from the World Food Program
to avoid starvation. In the fighting, roads and bridges
across the country were destroyed, stranding millions of
people in isolated towns and villages.
Beyond the war's terrible physical toll, those who return
face a country whose social fabric and national identity,
not yet fully formed when the war broke out between rival
liberation factions just after the Portuguese colonists
departed Angola in 1975, are in tatters.
Last month rebels in the National Union for the Total
Independence of Angola, or Unita, who have laid down their
weapons, completed the transformation from guerrilla army
to political party. They elected a leader to replace the
charismatic but brutal Jonas Savimbi, whose death last year
marked the end of their war with the quasi-Marxist Popular
Movement for the Liberation of Angola, or M.P.L.A., which
rules the country.
But Angola remains a long way from having a fully
functioning political system. The country has held only one
election, in 1992, and government officials say 2005 is the
earliest date possible for new elections.
"What we have in Angola now is negative peace," said
Raphael Marques, a 31-year-old journalist and dissident who
is the director of the Open Society Institute's Angolan
office. "It is the absence of conflict, yes. But it is
peace without justice, peace without opportunity, peace
without democracy. This is not a peace that promises much
to the Angolan people."
In the meantime, the Angolan government, led by President
José Eduardo dos Santos, has vowed to use Angola's wealth
of resources - mostly raw material that fueled the war - to
tackle these problems.
It announced last month that foreign oil companies planned
to invest billions to increase production. By 2020, Angola,
the ninth ranking supplier to the United States, could
triple its oil output to more than three million barrels a
day.
The country also has diamonds, iron ore, phosphates,
feldspar, bauxite, uranium and gold.
Few Angolans share in these riches. Foreign companies pay
huge fees to the government to take the nation's wealth
away, but little of it trickles down.
"The role of the state should be to take that wealth and
apply it in ways that will benefit the people of Angola,"
said Justino Pinto de Andrade, head of the department of
economics at the Catholic University of Angola in Luanda.
"The oil revenues go straight to the state budget, but the
people see very little benefit."
International groups that monitor how governments use the
money they get from selling their natural resources accuse
the Angolan government of mass corruption.
One British organization, Global Witness, investigated the
country's finances and found at least $1 billion worth of
revenues a year simply unaccounted for - a sum that is a
quarter of the nation's income.
Last year an internal report by the International Monetary
Fund on Angola's finances reached a similar conclusion.
Angola has not been able to qualify for low-cost loans from
the I.M.F. to help in the rebuilding effort. Instead the
government has borrowed money from private banks at high
interest rates, using its oil as collateral.
Last month, in a speech to an oil industry conference in
London, Angola's deputy prime minister acknowledged that
the government had failed to account for all of the money
it received from oil companies, and said Angola was
committed to reporting honestly on its revenues and
cracking down on corruption.
But the government declined to sign on to a voluntary
initiative created by Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain
that would require the country to report the payments it
receives from oil and mining companies.
In an interview in Luanda, the M.P.L.A. party spokesman,
Norberto dos Santos, who is not related to the president,
said the government was committed to helping the Angolan
people and making sure everyone benefited from the
country's wealth.
"We want prosperity for all of the Angolan people," Mr. dos
Santos said. "The government is committed to providing jobs
and other assistance. But these things take time."
For people like the Antonio family who arrive home with
nothing but dreams of a better future, the central
government is a distant force with little connection to
their daily struggle for survival.
"I am just a farmer," Mr. Antonio said when asked his
opinion of the Angolan government as the family arrived at
the transfer station the United Nations set up to handle
incoming refugees on the outskirts of M'banza Congo. "I
don't know about politics and I don't care. I only worry
about my family."
At a temporary camp here, the Antonio family stood in line
to collect the tools relief agencies offered to help them
build a new life: two pieces of plastic sheeting for
shelter, a set of pots and pans, five blankets, eight bars
of soap, three collapsible jerry cans and two buckets.
The next day they collected two bags of maize meal, a sack
of dry kidney beans, a few cups of salt and a couple of
gallons of oil from the World Food Program. The United
Nations High Commission for Refugees runs the camp with
help from several other aid organizations.
Mr. Antonio listened as workers from Handicap
International, an antimine group, gave instructions on how
to spot mines and bombs. Workers from another aid group
gave his screaming children vaccinations to prevent
diphtheria and measles.
The only representative of the Angolan government was a man
from the Ministry of Social Welfare, which is ostensibly in
charge of resettling displaced people, who strolled through
camp barking patriotic encouragement to the refugees
through a bullhorn.
"You are no longer refugees," the man said. "You are
Angolans."
The Antonio family's story is typically Angolan. On Jan.
26, 1999, a bomb fell on their mud-brick house as rebel
forces battled the army for control of M'banza Congo, the
capital of the northern province of Zaire and a strategic
point along the way to the large oil wells on the coast.
Everyone got out of the house safely, but the family lost
everything. Mr. Antonio said he did not know which side
shelled his house, and he said he did not care. The family
walked to the Congolese border with nothing but their
clothes and tattered shoes. For three harrowing days, with
no food and little water, two daughters and two sons in
tow, one just a baby, they walked through a war zone to the
border.
In Congo, the Antonios assembled a simple but relatively
comfortable life. Mr. Antonio built a hut with sticks and
mud so his wife and children would not have to sleep in a
crowded tent. When food ran short, he started farming in a
small plot in the camp. Life in the camp was not so bad -
his children went to school and his eldest son, Álvaro,
learned how to be a mechanic. The family received free
basic medical care.
"Life in Congo was good," Álvaro, who is now 18, said. "I
had friends there, and we would play football and go to
school together."
Álvaro, now finished with school, hopes to find work in
M'banza Congo.
"I don't want to work the land," Álvaro said. "I have seen
my father do it and the work is too hard and the money too
little. I want to have a job."
But his chances of finding work in his hometown are slim.
The war transformed M'banza Congo, once a thriving
provincial capital, into a decrepit and lifeless place.
Half-destroyed colonial-era buildings line its main strip,
the terra cotta roof tiles blown away, and listless young
men stand idle in the streets. There are few jobs here;
most people rely on handouts from aid agencies and
subsistence farming to survive.
There is no running water in most homes, and the
electricity works only in the center of town, and then
usually for only a few hours after twilight each day.
Malaria and typhoid are rampant, and few people can afford
to visit the newly renovated hospital, one bright spot in
town.
Though rich oil reserves lie just off the province's
shores, about 120 miles away, gasoline is hard to come by.
The pumps at the gas station on the town's main street have
been dry for years.
Still, Mr. Antonio surveys his hometown with a kernel of
hope. The morning after the family arrived, a truck waited
to take them home, to Ms. Merneza's parents' house, a
two-room mud-brick dwelling.
The children, led by 12-year-old Maria, lugged the family's
possessions onto the truck - four bristly piglets, some
tattered clothes, a couple of rough-hewn wooden benches and
a radio, the same one that brought them news that the war
was over.
"Life in Angola will be hard," Mr. Antonio said. "But as
long as we have peace, we can survive anything."

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/30/international/africa/30ANGO.html?ex=1060606232&ei=1&en=a3848ac7f17dd134

 

---------------------------------
Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:
http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html
HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company


Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.

Reply via email to