In a message dated 12/7/2003 9:20:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The Buganda Royals are not the only Ugandan Royals supporting a third term. 
What contributive politics have other Royals done for Uganda?? 



Nyabo Rehema:

I hope you do understand that because the Buganda are a major tribe in Uganda, utterances (or rather endorsement of Museveni's third term) by the so called Buganda royal leaders are taken very seriously as compared to utterance of a Mukongo Royal for instance.

Matek




Other tribes too can support whatever position they want, and their silence is what has kept them marginalized in politics and then they end up getting jealousy of the Buganda Royals' influence. 

Our Buganda Royals are making some noise to keep the spirit going while other Uganda's Royals marginalize themselves from influencing politics.  Why do other tribes feel threatened by what the Buganda Royals have to say??  Who is keeping other tribes from participating in the game??  The relationship between the influential and the marginalized will always be rocky.  That's expected, nothing new!
 
Rehema M.



Reply via email to