Mw. Kasangwawo,
You are 100% write about this guy Mulindwa. He's is on payroll of UPC's Adhola group. When I reply Matek's nusty hate messages, I reply them with the aim of countering his hate PLUS educating him on the Ganda culture & History. He's is not hiding his identity in any form. As for Mulindwa, its wasting time to educate him. He's already bent ( kakyama) such that we cannot educate him on Ganda culture and History. He has his own hatemonger agenda to fulfill for his masters.
Mw. Mulindwa, instead of asking the meaning of "Abaana be Ngoma" you repeat the same question. Do you know what it means? Ask any Luganda word, culture and history you will be given the answers by many of our netters here. In England, the succession line is number: #1, 2, 3, etc. Thats their culture. In Buganda, the succession is within " Abaana be Ngoma". The royal clan ( Abalangira) has over 400,000 people so dont expect all of them to be among "Abaana be Ngoma"
This is the 5th time we're explaining to you.
Ssenyange
----------------------------
From: "jonah kasangwawo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ugnet_: And now this!-Baganda royals back 3rd term\mulindwa Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:20:56 +0000
Mw. Ssenyange,
this has been an on-going problem with the Mulindwa communication gang. It might stem from the fact that members of this gang come from cultures that are ignorant of royalty, i.e. royalty in these cultures is non-existent and lack of knowledge about this subject is widespread. But their problem is that, instead of requesting to be educated, they jump on anything to do with Buganda. When you inform them about the issue, they come back pretending to know more about Buganda than anyone else, yet displaying more ignorance along the way.
Mulindwa and co, the questions you ask here have already been answered by Mw. Ssenyange's response. I'm therefore at a loss why you are repeating them. Have you been confused even more by the term "Abaana be ngoma" ?
Kasangwawo
http://www.infocom.co.ugFrom: "Mulindwa Edward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: ugnet_: And now this!-Baganda royals back 3rd term\mulindwa Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:28:16 -0500
Mwaami Ssenyange
But there is as well a trend of disassociating our selves with any body who
thinks different from the accepted margin.
When you ask a question on Buganda, you are a Nubian, when a Royal makes a
statement which is not publicly accepted that royal is a distant, Just how
far are we going to go?
Ssenyange instead of burning all your time, I think you would be help full
if you showed me either
1) The qualification of being a Distant royal or not distant, for we surely
can not sit here and when ever a statement comes from Mengo we wait for
Kasangwawo and Ssenyonjo to tell us whether that is from a distant or a
close Royal.
or 2) Tell us publicly that Mengo with in its self is sectarian.
For you see the danger in all this is that Museveni as a man who wants to be
in power, he can not refuse to use such a recommendation from a Royal for
they are distant. And if such a problem occurs in the Mengo, any organised
administration should have made that clear of who speaks publicly and who
does not, then we would publicly know that the Kingdom of Buganda runs by
Ssabasajja alone and the Royals can not make statements.
But we can not get that for even Kasangwawo refused to tell us who Kulembeka
more from Museveni, Ssabasajja or the distant royals?
Em
The Mulindwas Communication Group "With Yoweri Museveni, Uganda is in anarchy" Groupe de communication Mulindwas "avec Yoweri Museveni, l'Ouganda est dans l'anarchie" ----- Original Message ----- From: "ssenya nyange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:07 PM Subject: RE: ugnet_: And now this!-Baganda royals back 3rd term\mulindwa
>
> Mw. Mulindwa
>
> There is alot you dont know about Buganda and Baganda culture.
> Rather that disguising your self, please ask, we shall inform \ educate
> you. You said:
>
> --------------------------
> >"it is the Kabaka and his appointed officials who speak for Buganda and
not
> >some unknown royals." Now that is very interesting if you are telling us
> >that the appointed
> >officials are more powerful in the Kingdom than the Royals.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
>
> Mulindwa, is this new to you? Dont you know that the Bataka appointed the
> first Kabaka Kato Kintu in a Lukiiko to govern them after helping them to
> defeat Bemba Musota? Please get the facts: For a period of time, a woman
of
> Fumbe ( forgotten her name) ruled Buganda during the time when they were
> searching for the rightful prince ( not any prince). The prince has to be
> "Omwana we Ngoma". Not every prince can be a Kabaka because not all
princes
> are among the "Abaana be ngoma" Currently, I think these could be less
that
> 10.
> Secondly, a prince from Abaana be Ngoma is seconded by his father (
Kabaka)
> to suceed him. After his death, the altimate authority is rested into the
> Katikkiro and 4 or 5 Clan leaders. This means the power lies in the Bataka
> whose authority comes from the 52 Clan members.
>
> So, the princes and princess of the Balangira ( royal) clan
do
> not have any say in the kingdom matters. Only the appointed chiefs (
> abakungu), plus the Bataka and Abaana be Ngoma have authority in the
kingdom
> matters. Thats why the late Ba Ssekabaka killed the immediate princes (
> abaana be Ngoma) for fear of over throwing them. I thint thats why
> Kasangwawo called them "non entities"
>
> J. Ssenyange
> ------------------------------
>
> Mwaami
> >Kasangwawo there is a reason why they are called Royals and you are not.
> >And
> >it frightens if we start to classify the Royals as who is close and who
is
> >not, who is distant and who is not. For a critical thinker can wonder
which
> >standards you use to decide who is a close Royal and who is a distant
> >royal.
> >For example you are now using Ssabalangira's words, is he among the
distant
> >or the close?
> >And is Buganda Kingdom really that sectarian with in its self?
> >
> >Please enlighten me
> >Em
> >Toronto
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
-------------------------------------------- This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug
