You see this is why i am very skeptical about the credentials of UPC fellows such as you. To come openly on a public forum such as this and declare that France has "IMPECCABLE HUMAN RIGHTS RECORD" is astounding given past and present historical record of France vis-a-vis human rights. Most of this information is readily available on the internet. I then begin to think whether "human rights" has any meaning to you or probably you don't understand the term or both......then imagine such a person at the helm of affairs of a country....scary
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ugnet_: Museveni/Kagame Killed Habyalima/Cyprien Ntaryamira Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:47:08 EST
In a message dated 3/23/2004 2:34:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Matek, use your brains man...what do you expect from an inquiry done in
> france, instituted by the families of the french pilots who were flying the
> African heads of state. The judge is french, paid by the french government
> and carrying out the inquiry in France....were you really expecting him to
> reach any other conclusion than what he came out with.
EMuusaazi:
Okay let us use our brains here for a minute. You have two characters. For
the sake of this argument let us label them A (The french) and B ( Yoweri
Museveni and his NRM Military dictatorship. One character (say a) still believe in
the fundamental Human value known throughout the world of telling and abiding
by the TRUTH. Indeed this character has Impeccable CREDIBILITY.
The other character ( yoweri Museveni and the NRM) let say B, on the contrary
is a pathological lair.
If in the court of law, A offers evidence (circumstantial though it may be
according to you)...in this case the evidence presented is overwhelming and
pretty much implicates B as party to a CRIME committed against Humanity( were
800,000 people lost their lives)
B then ( Yoweri Museveni and the NRM ) denies the evidence presented by A,
in front of the jury of International Community
In your learned opinion, my friend, assuming you are using your brain, who would you rather believe A or B?
Matek
All his assertions
>
> are based on circumstancial evidence..and as usual the Africans are to blame
>
> (when it is bad news)...he is basically telling the family memebers the late
>
> pilots, that the Africans (not the French government) are responsible for
> the deaths of your relatives, so if you have any compensation claims to
> make, go to Africa. Maybe Uganda, Rwanda and America should institute their
> own inquiries and come out with their own findings.
>
> Matek is normally very "pan-africanist" in his outlook, but i guess this
> situation is self-serving to him as it puts his major antagonist (government
>
> of Uganda and) in bad light. One wonders why Mr. Matek is ready to believe
> the circumstancial and unverified inquiry of the French, while supporting
> Mugabe (and ZANU PF) against the French, American, Britain and the rest of
> the western world's accusation of human rights violations (most of which
> have been varified by Zimbabweans, black and white).
>
>
>
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the
people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It
thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to
repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by
extension, the truth becomes the greatest enemy of the state."
- Dr. Joseph M. Goebbels - Hitler's propaganda minister
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
-------------------------------------------- This service is hosted on the Infocom network http://www.infocom.co.ug
