This is another interesting article to check out. Ladit Peter-Rhaina Gwokto
   don't take me to task. Usual disclaimers apply.  Semei
  
  ===================================================
  
  Politics  :  Online Rights    
  See Who's Editing Wikipedia - Diebold, the CIA, a Campaign
  By John Borland  08.14.07 | 2:00 AM 
   
   
  CalTech graduate student Virgil Griffith built a search tool that 
  traces IP addresses of those who make Wikipedia changes. 
  Photo: Jake Appelbaum On November 17th, 2005, an anonymous 
  Wikipedia user deleted 15 paragraphs from an article on e-voting 
  machine-vendor Diebold, excising an entire section critical of the 
  company's machines. While anonymous, such changes typically 
  leave behind digital fingerprints offering hints about the contributor, 
  such as the location of the computer used to make the edits. 
  
  In this case, the changes came from an IP address reserved for 
  the corporate offices of Diebold itself. And it is far from an isolated 
  case. A new data- mining service launched Monday traces millions 
  of Wikipedia entries to their corporate sources, and for the first 
  time puts comprehensive data behind long standing suspicions of 
  manipulation, which until now have surfaced only piecemeal in 
  investigations of specific allegations. 
  
  Wikipedia Scanner -- the brainchild of Cal Tech computation and 
  neural- systems graduate student Virgil Griffith -- offers users a 
  searchable database that ties millions of anonymous Wikipedia 
  edits to organizations where those edits apparently originated, by  
cross-referencing the edits with data on who owns the associated 
  block of internet IP addresses. 
  
  Inspired by news last year that Congress members' offices had been 
  editing their own entries, Griffith says he got curious, and wanted to
  know whether big companies and other organizations were doing
  things in a similarly self- interested vein. 
  
  "Everything's better if you do it on a huge scale, and automate it," 
  he says with a grin. 
  
  This database is possible thanks to a combination of Wikipedia 
  policies and (mostly) publicly available information. 
  
  The online encyclopedia allows anyone to make edits, but keeps 
  detailed logs of all these changes. Users who are logged in are 
  tracked only by their user name, but anonymous changes leave a 
  public record of their IP address. 
  
  Share Your Sleuthing!
  
  Cornered any companies polishing up their Wikipedia entries? 
  Spotted any government spooks rewriting history? Try Virgil Griffith's 
  Wikipedia Scanner yourself, then submit your finds and vote on other 
  readers' discoveries here. The organization also allows downloads 
  of the complete Wikipedia, including records of all these changes. 
  
  Griffith thus downloaded the entire encyclopedia, isolating the XML-
  based records of anonymous changes and IP addresses. He then 
  correlated those IP addresses with public net-address lookup services 
  such as ARIN, as well as private domain-name data provided by 
IP2Location.com. 
  
  The result: A database of 34.4 million edits, performed by 2.6 million 
  organizations or individuals ranging from the CIA to Microsoft to 
  Congressional offices, now linked to the edits they or someone at 
  their organization's net address has made. 
  
  Some of this appears to be transparently self-interested, either 
  adding positive, press release-like material to entries, or deleting 
  whole swaths of critical material. 
  
  Voting-machine company Diebold provides a good example of the 
  latter, with someone at the company's IP address apparently deleting
  long paragraphs detailing the security industry's concerns over the 
  integrity of their voting machines, and information about the company's 
  CEO's fund-raising for President Bush. 
  
  The text, deleted in November 2005, was quickly restored by another 
  Wikipedia contributor, who advised the anonymous editor, "Please 
  stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism." 
  
  A Diebold Election Systems spokesman said he'd look into the 
  matter but could not comment by press time. 
  
  Wal-Mart has a series of relatively small changes in 2005 that
  burnish the company's image on its own entry while often leaving 
  criticism in, changing a line that its wages are less than other retail 
  stores to a note that it pays nearly double the minimum wage, 
  for example. Another leaves activist criticism on community impact 
  intact, while citing a "definitive" study showing Wal-Mart raised the 
  total number of jobs in a community. 
  
  
  

       
---------------------------------
Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, 
when. 
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to