Ce Ndolimana doit bien avoir des remords d'un gennocidaire.
Sharangabo
RE : *DHR* Re: [Kitchangahope] KAGAME and NKUNDA are from the old RPF SCHOOL.
(publicité)
ctxt_ad_interface ='http://cm.eu-kpi.east.yahoo.overture.com/js_1_0/';
ctxt_ad_height=250; ctxt_ad_width=300; ctxt_ad_source
='yahoo_eu_fr_jsads_ctxt_infinity'; ctxt_ad_id ='fr_clubs';
ctxt_ad_type='fr_clubs_lrec_300x250_cm2'; ctxt_ad_market='FR'; ctxt_ad_config =
'7199951610'; ctxt_ad_ie='latin1'; ctxt_ad_oe='latin1'; ctxt_ad_css =
'http://eur.a1.yimg.com/java.europe.yahoo.com/eu/any/infinitycss/ysminfinityeu.css';
ctxt_ad_newwin = 1; if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();
window.yzq_d['16cQBdFJq2g-']='&U=13am2j90s%2fN%3d16cQBdFJq2g-%2fC%3d125884.9515592.10243605.9211031%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d4069828';
Monsieur Rufagiri,
Votre dégringolade sera pitoyable, toi et tes chefs, le temps jouera
négativement contre vous. Momboutu fut aussi le Maréchal du grand Zaïre, il a
été enterré très loin de son pays dans un grand désarroi, Saddam Hussein est
mort pendu, Kabila père qui a aidé Kagame à tuer les réfugiés est mort fusillé
comme ces réfugiés et par les mêmes personnes qui les ont tué. Quiconque tuera
par l'épée mourra par l'épée.
Vous n'êtes que des pauvres vaniteux arrogants imbus de vous même.
Vous aimez verser le sang des innocents. C'est votre maladie, c'est votre
malédiction.
Que Dieu me prête la vie pour voir votre fin.
sharangabo rufagari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
sharangabo rufagari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
Laurent NKUNDA and the President of Rwanda are from the old RPF school of
tought.The one wich uses to teach HUMILITY.
NKUNDA for instance feels good about thoses things we do believe are
SMALL.For him it is a great contribution for peoples who believes in the right
cause to do.
KAGAME for instance I do know is someone who praised me all the time for
the little things I do for the Great Lakes and he did particulary thanked me
for It.He putted down himself to give thanks to an African who believes in the
destiny of our continent.I knew that his humbleness was coming from the RPF
school .Laurent himself is a former political Cadre of the RPF.I do speak with
him times to times.And what reflect from our conversation is a humility at the
PERFECTION as never seen.
I once asked a Canadian graphologist to describe to me the person behind
this HANDRWITING.The Canadian Professional told.That this person "MUST BE A
VERY POWERFUL PERSON IN THE WORLD" and "HE WAS A VERY HUMBLE A NICE PERSON".I
told him that this person was indeed a very POWERFUL person who makes changes
in the World happen.And he was so humble that he was my friend.I showed the
picture you all sees it with H.E on my signature.
The Graphologist was impressed and I walked away.
This message from KAGAME to JACKIE is a gift to you.As not many
of you never had the chance to see the HANDRWITING of a LIVING LEGEND.
RWANDA'S LIVING LEGEND IN LONDON.
sharangabo rufagari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No COMMENTS
Dear Jackie,
Thank you very much. I am impressed you took your time to give such an
extensive answer to my question. I know rebuttals of this kind end up in the
trash, but now I am happy to have sent it to you, at least it's going to reach
your readers. Thank you so much.
Looking forward to meeting you in Mushaki, only God knows when!!!!
Antoinette
Greetings Antoinette,
That would be a dream come true to meet some day in Mushaki - a Mushaki in the
hands of Nkunda.
Until that day I pray for amahoro,
Jackie Jura
Jackie Jura
~ an independent researcher monitoring local, national and international events
~
www.orwelltoday.com
EMAIL & HOME PAGE
sharangabo rufagari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dears,
I have come to like the correspondances between those wonderful ladies.And
surely they are both close to LAURENT'S heart.
Sharangabo
NEWS COVERING CONGO
To Orwell Today,
Dear Jackie,
I hope you are fine! I shared with you some good reporting from AFP recently.
Now you'll forgive me for sharing an ambiguous one, written by Lydia Polgreen
for the New York Times, and sending my reaction:
"Dear Madam,
"I am reacting to your article on the conflict in DRC (headline After Clashes,
Fear of War on Congos Edge). First and foremost, thank you for the interest in
my country.
"Secondly, I would like you to know that your report is very partial when it
reduces the source of the conflict to only two factors: tensions between Hutus
and Tutsis in Rwanda on one hand, and on the other the wealthy resources of the
Congo. There are deeper problems which you could find easily by doing a bit of
historical homework: contemporary journalists tend to read the history of Congo
only from 1996 as you do; the keener ones go as far as mentionning Mobutu's
dictatorship as if this was the whole history. But even if it is allowed to
only read the history of the DRC from 1996, you cannot jump over the different
agreements that tried to solve the conflict. Only by taking the bother to read
the Sun City agreement, could you see that the problem of the DRC isn't Nkunda
as your friends of HRW spread it all over the world. In case you decide to
research in that way, your report could give a better understanding of issues.
"Thirdly, it's amazing to notice that talking about the last days' events in
the Kivu, you could fail to say how this is Kabila's war. Kabila wanted this
war against all common sense, even all advice and opinion of those very foreign
powers that paid for him to win elections. It could be very interesting for
good reporting to find out, why Kabila wanted so much this war. Nkunda never
wanted it. He has been only asking for negotiations, stating he would defend
himself when attacked. That is what he is actually doing. Please, as a
committed journalist, find out for the whole world why Kabila needed so much to
fight Nkunda and why his Army High Command did not tell him he would lose the
war? What is he going to achieve by losing it? Because he is losing it. And why
on earth the UN peacekeeping mission is supporting him knowing he is using
genocide forces, and showing by that that Nkunda's fears for the minorities and
for the fate of the entire congolese army are real? Why
isn't HRW accusing FDLR? Why isn't HRW denouncing humanitarian NGOs who are
not assisting displaced people in CNDP controlled areas, and the ongoing
killing of Tutsis in Goma, Sake and Rutshuru (I can send you current facts as
soon as you give me a feedback? Etc, etc, etc." [end of rebuttal of NYT article]
What do you think of both the New York Times article and my reaction?
And since we are talking about the Congo, are you seeing like me that the UN
"warmongers" are going to get a new mandate where they have failed for so many
years now?
Thank you and have a nice week end,
Antoinette Kankindi
Greetings Antoinette,
Actually, I'd read the headline of that NYT article the other day but didn't
read very far down into it because usually New York Slimes (oops, I mean Times)
articles are long and somewhat boring, with so many lies interwoven amongst the
few nuggets of truth that they are seldom worthy of sharing with readers on any
particular issue. They're a modern-day version of what Orwell described as the
Ministry of Truth (Lies) in "1984". They are written from, as you commented in
your rebuttal, a "very partial" point of view.
In reading through the NYT article in question - as a favour to you - I
recognized the usual formula, ie facts interspersed with contradictory
conclusions and an obvious choosing of sides. The journalist is writing from a
pro-Kabila government, pro-United Nations, pro-genocidal-Hutu, anti-Tutsi,
anti-Nkunda bias, or in other words, she's spouting the international Party
line.
It's commendable that you read the article and made the effort to respond in
order to set the record straight, your points of which I bolded and underlined
in your letter above. However, a person's chances of seeing a rebuttal appear
anywhere in the hundreds of pages among the dozen sections of the fat NYT daily
newspaper are slim - or (as we say here in Canada) about the same as a
snowball's chance in hell.
I did, however, learn something new - like you - in reading the article. The
last sentence - where she says: "The United Nations Security Council will be
voting this month on renewing the mandate of the peacekeeping force here, known
as Monuc" - does seem to be reporting that, as you say, "the UN 'warmongers'
are going to get a new mandate".
That is truly a terrifying prospect. How horrible it must be for the people of
the Congo (and I certainly noticed it when I was in Goma, just before the much
ballyhooed UN-orchestrated elections) to see that practically the only people
with vehicles or anything money can buy are foreigners comprised of UN aid
workers or UN bureaucrats or other non-governmental agencies (NGOs) such as
Human Rights Watch (HRW). In the short time I was there I saw more SUVs - white
with big black UN letters - than I could count.
I even caught one of those white UN vehicles on film when I was snapping a
photo of the boy with the wooden bike. A picture says a thousand words and this
one is symbolic of the disparity in prosperity between the thousands of UN
foreigners in Congo and the actual citizens of Congo for whom the UN pretends
to be there to help. In reality, the UN only helps itself, and it helps itself
to plenty. See Orwell's Ministry of Plenty (Starvation) theme.
I arrived at the conclusion a long time ago (with help from George Orwell who
described it as Big Brother) that the United Nations is an evil organization
whose members feed off the war and misery they create in the name of peace and
humanitarian aid.
Sometimes I fear for Nkunda and the people of the Congo for what they are up
against, but I also believe that good is more powerful than evil and that
somewhere and sometime good will prevail. I pray that it is in Nkunda's and our
time here on earth and not in the distant future.
Amahoro masa,
Jackie Jura
PS - On an optimistic note I've been impressed with much of the BBC coverage
and have been posting links to many of their articles. Some recent ones can be
seen below the WAR UN PEACE IN CONGO report from the other day.
I think Orwell would be pleased with BBC too, as he had a soft spot for them,
having worked for them during the war years during which time he said he never
compromised - nor was he ever asked to - his beliefs or opinions on any matter.
That's why I've put that BBC photo of him at the top of this page today. It's
one I look at every day here in my office because it's on my wall up to the
left of my computer screen and I glance at it occassionaly for reasurance from
him.
Jackie Jura
~ an independent researcher monitoring local, national and international events
~
www.orwelltoday.com
EMAIL & HOME PAGE
RWANDA RAVE REVIEWS
Sharangabo Rufagari
Montreal
---------------------------------
Looking for a X-Mas gift? Everybody needs a Flickr Pro Account!_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
