Saudi Arabia Rejects U.N. Security Council Seat in Protest Move
By <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/robert_f_worth /index.html> ROBERT F. WORTH WASHINGTON Saudi Arabia stunned the United Nations and even some of its own diplomats on Friday by rejecting a highly coveted seat on the Security Council, a decision that underscored the depth of Saudi anger over what the monarchy sees as weak and conciliatory Western stances toward Syria and Iran, Saudi Arabias regional rival. The Saudi decision, which could have been made only with King Abdullahs approval, came a day after it had won a Security Council seat for the first time, and it appeared to be unprecedented. The Saudi Foreign Ministry released a statement rejecting the seat just hours after the kingdoms own diplomats both at the United Nations and in Riyadh, the Saudi capital were celebrating their new seat, the product of two years of work to assemble a crack diplomatic team in New York. Some analysts said the sudden turnabout gave the impression of a self-destructive temper tantrum. But one Saudi diplomat said the decision came after weeks of high-level debate about the usefulness of a seat on the Security Council, where Russia and China have repeatedly drawn Saudi anger by blocking all attempts to pressure Syrias president, Bashar al-Assad. Abdullah has voiced rising frustration with the continuing violence in Syria, a fellow Muslim-majority nation where one of his wives was born. He is said to have been deeply disappointed when President Obama decided against airstrikes on Syrias military in September in favor of a Russian-proposed agreement to secure Syrias chemical weapons. And Saudi officials made no secret of their fear that a nuclear deal between Iran and the West, the subject of multilateral talks this week in Geneva with another round scheduled for early November, could come at their expense, leaving them more exposed to their greatest regional rival. The Saudi decision may also reflect a broader debate within the Saudi ruling elite about how to wield influence: the Saudis have long resisted taking a seat on the Security Council, believing it would hamper their discreet diplomatic style. Still, the sudden about-face came across as a slap to the United Nations and the United States, one of Saudi Arabias strongest Western allies. On Thursday evening, the American ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, had issued a <http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/215606.htm> statement congratulating the five new nonpermanent members Chad, Chile, Lithuania, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia. Officials at the United States Mission to the United Nations had no immediate comment. Russia was sharply critical of the Saudi gesture. We are surprised by Saudi Arabias unprecedented decision, the Foreign Ministry said in a statement from Moscow carried by news agencies. The kingdoms arguments arouse bewilderment and the criticism of the U.N. Security Council in the context of the Syria conflict is particularly strange. There was shock and dismay in Riyadh, too, where the Saudi political elite had seemed thrilled at the prospect of a shift to a more public and assertive diplomatic stance. Late on Thursday, the spokesman for the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Osama Nugali, forwarded a message on his Twitter account celebrating the kingdoms election to the Security Council. The message was <https://twitter.com/JKhashoggi/status/390900910454747136> written by Jamal Khashoggi, a journalist with links to the ruling elite. Many other prominent Saudis also forwarded the message, which congratulated the kingdom for winning a seat it had sought for more than two years with the help of a team of the best Saudi diplomats to represent the kingdom. Many experts had assumed that Saudi Arabias pursuit of a Security Council seat signaled a new desire to be more public and assertive in its stances toward the Syrian civil war and the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Saudi ambassador to the United Nations, Abdallah Y. al-Mouallimi, was clearly elated after the General Assembly vote on Thursday. We take this election very seriously as a responsibility to be able to contribute to this very important forum to peace and security of the world, <http://webtv.un.org/watch/abdallah-yahya-a.-al-mouallimi-saudi-arabia-elect ion-of-saudi-arabia-election-as-non-permanent-member-of-> he told reporters. Our election today is a reflection of a longstanding policy in support of moderation and in support of resolving disputes by peaceful means. The statement on Friday struck a far different tone, calling for changes to enhance the Security Councils contribution to peace. It did not say what those should entail. Allowing the ruling regime in Syria to kill and burn its people by the chemical weapons, while the world stands idly, without applying deterrent sanctions against the Damascus regime, is also irrefutable evidence and proof of the inability of the Security Council to carry out its duties and responsibilities, the statement s Rick Gladstone contributed reporting from New York, Alan Cowell from London, and Ben Hubbard from Beirut. Thé Mulindwas Communication Group "With Yoweri Museveni and Dr. Kiiza Besigye Uganda is in anarchy" Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi "Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni na Dk. Kiiza Besigye Uganda ni katika machafuko"
_______________________________________________ Ugandanet mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
