Friends

 

Here is another study again done by individuals that believe that we have a 
serious violence problem in Uganda. Let me remind you that this study does not 
say anywhere that NRA commited these crimes it says LRA committed them. And 
that is what I am trying to point out here that if an Acholi can treat his 
fellow Acholi this way, how about you on a road block in Kawempe? This study 
was made by Martha Bragin, MD and Taaka Jennipher, MA as  the principle 
investigators. They were financed by The Austrian Development  corporation, 
under the Care umbrella. The topic of the study is called “Conflict-Affected 
Women’s perceptions of Psychosocial Well-Being in The Acholi sub –region of 
Northern Uganda”  Friends Austrians do not hate Acholi and they are not out 
there to plant tribe hate they ae simply using the data they found in 
Acholi-land to get this concerned.

 

We are posting from page 25

 

The Psychological and Social Situation of Formerly Abducted Girls 

 

Both girls and boys held captive by the LRA experienced extreme hardship that 
included their forced participation in atrocities as combatants (Akello, 2006; 
Betancourt, 2008; Blattman & Annan, 2007; Bolton et al., 2007; Kryger, 2011; 
Kryger & Lindgren, 2011; Machel, 2000; Omona & Matheson, 1998; McCarthy & 
Marks, 2010; Mendelsohn, 1998; Pedersen, 2002; Pham et al., 2007; Stichick, 
2001; Wessells, 2004). They equally lacked shelter, food, accessibility to 
medical care and education (Akello, 2006; Annan et al., 2010; Barton & Mutiti, 
1998; Blattman & Annan, 2007; Machel, 2000; MacMullin & Loughry, 2004). 
However, girls’ experiences were particularly calamitous due to gender-based 
violence (Amnesty International, 2007; Annan et al., 2008; Fox, 2004; McKay & 
Mazurana, 2004; Orach, 2009). Girls were often subjected to sexual abuse by 
multiple perpetrators (Mazurana & McKay, 2003; Wood, 2009). They were also 
forcibly “married” to captors who had many wives and pregnancy could exacerbate 
violence. Girl mothers would often carry their babies on their backs during 
warfare. A common practice was to drug the babies, in order to sedate them 
during the fighting. While many girls died during pregnancy and childbirth due 
to lack of medical care and difficult circumstances under which  they were 
living, others self-induced abortions to spare their children the suffering 
into which they would be born. (Annan et al., 2008, in press; Baines, 2008; 
Pham et al., 2007; McKay, 2004; McKay & Mazurana, 2004). 

Girls, who eventually escaped or were rescued from their captivity in the bush, 
often did not go through the official UN protocol of disarmament, 
demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) (McKay, 2004; Mazurana et al., 2002; 
McKay & Mazurana, 2004). This process entails demobilizing soldiers, removing 
their guns, and providing psychological and material assistance to 
ex-combatants to help them return to their civilian way of life (Baines, 2008; 
Betancourt, 2009; McKay, 2004). Although girls and boys were equally entitled 
to DDR by law, many girls were not afforded the benefits of this formal 
process. Instead, they simply returned to impoverished communities without any 
intervening support. With few resources or support available to them, these 
girls often relocate to locations where family members and friends live, or 
they move to urban areas where they are at a much higher risk of being forced 
into prostitution, experience sexual assault, and contract sexually transmitted 
diseases, such as HIV (Amnesty International, 2007; Baines, 2008; McKay, 2005). 

Additional difficulties ensue, even when young, formerly abducted girls and 
women attempt to participate in formal demobilization programs (Amnesty 
International, 2007; Baines, 2008; Mazurana et al., 2002; McKay & Mazurana, 
2004). DDR in many war-torn regions has targeted boys and men while 
disregarding the roles girls and women have played as combatants in fighting 
forces. McKay and Mazurana (2004) note that there is a gender-discriminatory 
framework at play, which perpetuates the view that girls and women only served 
as “sex slaves,” “wives,” and “camp followers” while in the bush. They are 
therefore not eligible for the skills training and schooling made available to 
male ex-combatants, as part of the DDR process, despite evidence that they had 
in fact fought alongside men and boys who committed the same acts (McKay & 
Mazurana, 2004). This parallels similar difficulties  among other girls in the 
region, and should not be seen as an isolated problem. Even when the rigorous 
use of traditional ceremonies are designed to promote community acceptance, 
girls and young women continue to be viewed suspiciously, and with contempt, by 
their family members and neighbors (Akello, 2006; Amnesty International, 2007; 
Annan et al., 2008; Baines, 2008; Mazurana & McKay, 2004; UNICEF, 2005). 

The literature also indicates that girl mothers face particular challenges in 
providing for themselves and their children, due to a lack of education and 
resources (Annan et al., 2008; McKay & Mazurana, 2004). Again, despite 
participation in reintegration ceremonies, girl mothers in Northern Uganda face 
rejection by former husbands, and with their children are often threatened and 
abused by family and community members (Annan et al., 2008; Mazurana & McKay, 
2004). In order to avoid threats and potential re-abduction by the LRA and 
their captor “husbands,” girl mothers often move to distant communities and 
avoid living or associating themselves with other girl mothers to avoid 
negative attention. Yet by living in isolation, these mothers are prone to 
depression and feelings of hopelessness (Annan et al., 2009; Betancourt & Khan, 
2008). 

Other studies indicate that formerly abducted girls and women exhibit 
difficulty in abiding by the cultural norms and gender-specific roles of their 
communities after having lived as combatants in the bush for extended periods 
of time. Some may then be prone to violent outbursts. These psychological 
symptoms are also cited as a source of difficulty in achieving acceptance as 
members within their communities (Annan et al., 2008; Baines, 2008; Kryger, 
2011; Mazurana et al., 2002; McKay, 2004; McKay & Mazurana, 2004; Vinck et al., 
2007). 

A recently published study focusing exclusively on women and girls returning 
from LRA captivity however challenged these notions in the years following the 
amnesty and return of the population from the IDP camps (Annan et al., 2011). 
The study noted the tendency toward psychosocial resilience among  these women 
and girls, especially amongst those who returned as mothers, specifically 
contradicting earlier findings. The study points out that one factor not 
studied or considered, is that those who were unable to find correlates to 
resilience, may have died or been killed in captivity and that the capacity for 
survival itself should be understood. Still that does not explain the 
relatively positive coping shown by the populations in the intervening years 
between 2008 and the present study. 

Participants of the study were asked to define economic well-being as well as 
psychological and social difficulties. The study did not look at the 
effectiveness of the various psychosocial programs in which the formerly 
abducted may have participated and therefore stopped short of developing 
specific indicators for psychosocial well-being, leaving them for future 
studies such as this one. 

These may be significant as they may help to account for the relatively 
positive findings only four years after the more negative ones.

 

 

Stay in the forum for Series fifty-one on the way   ------>

 

EM

On the 49th Parallel          

                 Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in anarchy"
                    Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni katika 
machafuko" 

_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet

UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/ugandanet@kym.net/

The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to