Hi Nobuchi-san, After some test of the new annotation code, I've found a problem related eb-ctx. Perhaps It is assumed to be a singleton like instance, but eb-init and eb-release are called for every context. This will cause releasing a wrong eb-ctx. Could you fix this problem?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Etsushi Kato <ek.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Muneyuki Noguchi <nogu....@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/4/14 Etsushi Kato: >>> How about creating uim-notify like framework of selecting the methods >>> of acquisition with eb as a default? Just a thought. > [...] >> https://gist.github.com/370059/a41a369e93468729e796c8cfd03602338ea12a27 >> >> This patch introduces (enable-annotation?) and (annotation-agent), and >> doesn't add (eb-*) to im.scm. >> >> How about this one? > > Thanks for your work. > > I've just reviewed the latest one > (http://gist.github.com/370059/47b9b7dfe8416d55d4c129bbb3f30539548804cd) > and seems fine. Please go ahead to commit this. > > One thing I've come up with is the lack of dynamic reconfiguration of > annotation agent by uim-pref for working process. Anyway, I'll do the > corresponding work for uim-gtk and uim-xim, and dynamic > reconfiguration thing later. > > Cheers, > -- > Etsushi Kato > -- Etsushi Kato -- Google Groups "uim-en" group uim-en@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/uim-en/about
