> > Will this change to user code be able to be done automatically by a > script? It seems like it might be a little ugly to do.
Yes, a single line inserted after process(inCas,...): inCas = inCas.getView(); // automatically added by migration > > Also it still very confusing that the CAS interface can refer to > either the base CAS or a view. If we make your proposed change I > think we might also want to create a separate CasView interface. But > that causes even more trouble for a migration script; it may not even > be possible to do non-interactively. :( Or one can say that the base CAS is a view without a Sofa. At any rate, eliminating the confustion of which view is delivered to the process method would be a useful simplication, as well as consistent with the preliminary architecture specification. Eddie
