Marshall Schor wrote:
I wonder if things like the Whitespace Annotator in the sandbox should
use "org.apache.uima...." as the start of their package names.
I think this is fine if the thing is destined to be an incorporated
part of the uima java project.
Should it be something else, otherwise?
-Marshall
I would vote to start at least with "org.apache.uima...", since the
stuff belongs to the Apache UIMA project. If we should not use exactly
the same name space we can also use
"org.apache.uima_annotators..." or "org.apache.uima_sandbox.annotators"
if we think it is better.
-- Michael
