Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I think there is sufficient resistance to the CommonCas, and we
should undo the change. Marshall?
I don't think it would be good to undo this. It seems valuable to me
to factor out common things, make more explicit what's
intended to be the same, and what's intended to be different, and
factoring shrinks the code base,
making future maintenance easier. Of course, if we adopt the
get-rid-of-JCas as a separate interface
suggestion, then this goes away. I'm fine with picking a better name
for it, also.
-Marshall
It seems we not only have different technical opinions, but we're not
agreed on process, either. You're the only one in favor of this
change, with me strongly opposed, Adam not in favor, and the rest
silent. We've both given our technical reasons, we're not going to
reach consensus. In my understanding, this means that the change is
not approved and doesn't go in. What is your opinion on how to handle
such a case?
My understanding of the Apache Way process is that one committer is all
it takes to veto a change. Although I don't think I've seen a -1 vote
on this, it looks like there's little support for keeping this in - so
I'll undo this one.
-Marshall
