On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the uimaj project's pom, the <parent> element points to itself.
I don't see any <parent> element in the uimaj project's pom. > Also, there are two elements defining the javadoc plugin - is this > intentional, or should/can > these be merged? > They are different. One is in <pluginManagent> and just specifies what version of the javadoc plugin to use. The other is in <reporting> and has the specifics on javadoc generation when mvn site:site is run. (This generates the javadocs for the website - I put instructions for this on the Wiki a while back.) There is yet another javadoc generation command as part of the assembly process, that builds the javadocs to be included in the distribution. > If we are heading toward putting things in the Apache / Maven > repositories, should we make > our POMs inherit from Apache-wide poms? I recall some discussion about > this in incubator - creating a parent for incubating projects, for instance. > Maybe but I would prefer to deal with that later. As I recall this is not a requirement. -Adam
