Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hi Marshall,
a few weeks ago I tested cruisecontrol with the uima project
and it worked with our maven project structure.
Maybe you would like to take a look at it.
Great, thanks.
I'm still trying to get a sense of the communities. I found this:
http://www.chris-read.net/?p=13
comparing CruiseControl version 2.6 (now at 2.7), bamboo 1.0 (it's now
at 1.2.2), and
teamCity 1.2 (now at 2.1).
See also http://xooctory.xoocode.org/ - it's another CI open source project
whose team works on other Apache projects. It has a section on comparison
about 1/2 down the page.
A quick look at Apache projects - I could only find one that was using
CI (Harmony).
Still don't have any definite opinions, myself...
-Marshall
Jörn
On Aug 15, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
Saw another post (may be outdated) that said Continuum didn't handle
"flat" Maven
structures, only the "nested" ones - and we're using the "flat"
approach I think.
-Marshall (hoping to get to continuous integration at some point :-)
Marshall Schor wrote:
More info:
Several posts on maven-user on the topic "is continuum dead" suggest
another alternative,
https://hudson.dev.java.net/
and another says here's a matrix of various tools:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix
-Marshall (hoping that at some point, we'll get to continuous
integration... )
Marshall Schor wrote:
If and when we decide that "continuous integration" is the way to
go, Atlassian, the folks who did Jira and Confluence Wiki (which
we're using) also have a continuous integration product, called
Bamboo.
Several Apache projects are using it, here:
http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/
-Marshall
