Marshall Schor wrote:
The "site.xml" file in the project uimaj-eclipse-update-site had to have
a value stating where the update site is located. It currently says:
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/eclipse-update-site
Part of our release process needs to move the files from the
uimaj-eclipse-update-site/target directory to that update site.
Seems to be a similar step as moving some release artifacts to the maven
repository.
I think that our set of released artifacts that should be
scanned-with-RAT / reviewed should include the artifacts for the update
site. Do others agree?
If so, can Michael add a directory for the update site artifacts to the
release candidate at
people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03 , or something
else that's better?
I added the update site artifacts to
people.a.o:/home/mbaessler/distributions/uimaj-2.2.1/03/eclipseUpdateSite
Unless someone wants to offer contrary opinions, I'll post to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a question about having our next release include an
eclipse update site, and if its OK to have it at the
http://incubator.apache.org/uima/downloads/eclipse-update-site
location. I see that other projects do this kind of thing. But I've
also seen that all "distributions" have to be in specific places.
Fine with me. Go ahead a ask on the incubator list.
I think if we have now an update site, we should also add a test case to
the test plan for this.
-- Michael
