Adam Lally wrote:
On Dec 20, 2007 12:19 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So - my preference would be mostly one of "don't care", but with a very
slight leaning toward having the release event result in the creation of
a new subdir under d/i/uima/<release-identification> and under that, the
set of files that go with that release; with files that don't change
with each release, like KEYS, at the top. Such an organization would
allow a user browsing the directories to download both the binary and
source releases for a particular version, perhaps slightly more easily.
I can also see the value of top level "binaries, source, docs"
organization, because a user browsing the directory would likely have in
mind one of these things they want to go after (although, that might run
into difficulties if we distribute things that don't fall into these
categories, at some point).
I also see value both ways. But given that ant, commons, and httpd do
it with the top-level "binaries, source, docs" organization, my
(slight) preference would be to do it that way. If there are any
users who actually go poking around directly in dist/incubator, it
would be nice for them if there was some consistency.
-Adam
Let's stop discussing and make progress :-) Which way should we go. I
think Adam is right, we should do it the most common way.
So do you all agree with my preview layout?
-- Michael
