Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The parts being included in the binary distribution of uima-as include:
uima-as
(base) uima
some Spring jars
some ActiveMQ jars
saxon 8 or 9 jar
Each of these probably have LICENSE, NOTICE, README files.
The packaging needs to do something about these.
LICENSE - must be merged, 1 file. see
http://apache.org/dev/release.html#license
NOTICE - not specified. Perhaps doesn't need to be merged. I'll dig
further on this.
README - not specified. Suggest we have have just one README for
uima-as, incorporating whatever seems reasonable from base uima, and
leave it at that.
Does this seem right?
-Marshall
Sorry about the multiple replies...
While working on this, could we also eliminate the sandbox dependencies
on uimaj-distr? Since we need to have source distros for the various
sandbox releases we're planning, it would be good if they didn't have
any non-maven (i.e., local) dependencies. It would mean duplicating
at least the incubation disclaimer, but I think we can manage that.
Opinions?
I think this may be a good idea. The LICENSE/NOTICE/README files
probably will be different for the at least some of the sandbox projects.
From a dependency viewpoint, there still is a dependency on uimaj as a
superPOM. As long as we're keeping a strategy of common-ness among the
projects, I guess I think that's OK.
Opinions?
-Marshall
