Yes, this method *is* replaced by the other initialize() method. JC
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Jerry Cwiklik (JIRA) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Let me try again. This method is not used and *should* not be used. It > was in the API as the first implementation of initialization for UIMA AS > client. Much of the intialization code has changed since. It should not be > called -period. I dont see a reason for keeping this around. > > Jerry, just for clarification, it sounds like the method to be removed > here was completely replaced by a second, better designed version. Is > that right? > > Thanks, > Eddie >
