Many thanks Bhavani, that was the sanity check I was looking for. Eddie
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Bhavani Iyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My tests of both the src and binary RC2 versions ran successfully on Windows > and Linux. > I was able to build the SDK from source, and build and run the examples. > Calling C++ annotator from Java also ran without problems. The service > wrapper also > worked fine. > > Bhavani > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Waiting for a sanity check before submitting a vote. >> >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi Eddie - >> > >> > If you are ready for us to review and vote, can you post your desires in >> a >> > [VOTE] message :-) >> > >> > -Marshall >> > >> > Eddie Epstein wrote: >> >> >> >> RC2 for uimacpp-2.2.2-incubating is at p.a.o >> >> ~eae/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.2.2/02/ >> >> >> >> Issues fixed since rc1 >> >> >> >> UIMA-1037: buildsdk.sh on Mac OSX creates bad symbolic link >> libuima.jnilib >> >> UIMA-1039: Fix use of non thread safe calls service wrapper Update >> >> property names in reply message to be compatible with Java. >> >> UIMA-1049: Uimacpp logging facility is not thread safe >> >> UIMA-1063: Incorrect push/pop used in JNI code >> >> UIMA-1064: Clarify uimacpp build environment and dependencies >> >> UIMA-1066: Incorrect property name TimeInProcessCAS in reply message >> >> UIMA-1072: Remove call to Java logger at service initialization start >> >> UIMA-1096: Incorrect metaData returned when deployed as a separate >> process >> >> UIMA-1103: SWIG interface doesn't support CASException thrown from >> >> some common APIs >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >
