Hi guys, Not sure if I am supposed to initiate the vote myself as I am not a committer. Are you in favour of adding the Tika Annotator to the sandbox?
Best, Julien -- DigitalPebble Ltd http://www.digitalpebble.com 2008/10/23 Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jörn Kottmann wrote: > > > > On Oct 10, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Julien Nioche wrote: > > > >> Hi Jorn, > >> > >> The MarkupAnnotator could be useful for many UIMA users, including me. > >> Maybe > >>> it would be nice if its possible to configure the types used for > markup. > >> > >> > >> that's a general issue with UIMA and most AEs rely on a preexisting > >> typeset. > >> The solution would be to have a generic resource for mapping between > >> files > >> (e.g. feature named X in type T is the same as feature Y in type U) or > >> rule > >> based system allowing you to do manipulate annotations (like JAPE in > >> GATE). > > > > No, I was talking about a type mapping which could be configured in the > > descriptor > > for example. > > > > Is there anything which must be discussed before Julien can > > start the vote ? > > I haven't had time to look at the code myself, but you and Thomas have, > and I have seen other contributions of Julien, so that's good enough > for me. We've been talking about a Tika annotator for a while, so > let's go for it. Please do start a formal vote. > > Julien, since you are contributing more, it would be good if you could > send in an ICLA (individual contributor licensing agreement). It's a > relatively painless form that you need to send to the ASF secretary > which helps us to keep our IP story clean. See the UIMA web site > http://incubator.apache.org/uima/get-involved.html > and the ASF page here: > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas > > --Thilo > > > > > Jörn > >
