Marshall Schor wrote: > This was a vote on accepting the Configurable Feature Extractor into the > sandbox. Please read http://markmail.org/message/kyw4xwa3gnyhnuwu for > the discussion that happened on the thread. So far there are 3 +1 > votes, and a concern raised by Thilo regarding its overall packaging > (which includes some EMF jars). > > Please cast your vote, if you haven't already. > > -Marshall
I voted +0, in case that got lost in all the verbiage. --Thilo
