Sorry I'm late... thanks for the reminder. Here is a +0 from my side.
Let me explain why I'm not so convinced about this submission into the Sandbox. If I follow the discussion threads it seems to me very similar to the ConceptMapper submission we had in June 2008. There we added the coded after some discussions to the Sandbox and now it is there and nothing (if I check the SVN history) happened after the initial import. That is from my side a little bit disappointing. E.g. adding documentation to show the benefit, merging code with DictionaryAnnotator concepts, adding some tests to see if all works fine... I don't want to block the submission of CFE into the Sandbox, I just want to share my thoughts. Maybe it works better this time. -- Michael Marshall Schor wrote: > Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into > the sandbox. > > There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see > http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a request > for a Jira submission. The original did not have documentation. The > submission has now been updated and documentation included. > > [ ] +1 accept CAS viewer source code into sandbox > [ ] 0 don't care > [ ] -1 don't accept, I still have issues > > > -Marshall
