generics: ResourceFactory.produceResource

[Jörn Kottmann]

The current declaration with out generics:

 public Resource produceResource(Class aResourceClass, 
ResourceSpecifier aSpecifier,
         Map<String, Object> aAdditionalParams) throws 
ResourceInitializationException;

Can it be assumed that aResourceClass is always a class which extends 
Resource,
if so it could be declared as Class<? extends Resource>.

There are many places where aResourceClass occurs, we should handle them 
all identical.

Jörn