for SimpleServer the patch supplied in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1582 fix the tests (if you can give it a try, in order to make sure this is not an environment dependent issue).for RegexAnnotator I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1581
Changing the discussed dependencies does not affect tests. Tommaso 2009/9/22 Thilo Goetz <twgo...@gmx.de> > Tommaso Teofili wrote: > > Hi Marshall,I tried to remove jsr173 dependency from SimpleServer and > > DictionaryAnnotator and used Xmlbeans 2.4.0 version. > > Tests and packaging behave properly (/lib directory had not been removed > in > > SimpleServer since I was waiting for the issue to be closed, but it > should > > be deleted as soon as "Maven way" is definitely chosen). > > > > StAX ( http://stax.codehaus.org/Home ) is under Apache License 2.0 so > it's > > ok from the licensing point of view, we should only investigate if we > "like" > > this JSR173 specification implementation or we would like to choose > another > > one. > > In my opinion it is ok (no more dependencies needed). > > If the test cases go through, it's safe to switch and > I'm all for it (speaking for SimpleServer and RegexAnnotator). > > --Thilo > > > > > Tommaso > > > > > > 2009/9/21 Marshall Schor <m...@schor.com> > > > >> Several sandbox projects have dependencies on xmlbeans (e.g. > >> RegularExpressionAnnotator, SimpleServer, and > >> ConfigurableFeatureExtractor). > >> > >> The first 2 have obtained xmlbeans from http://xmlbeans.apache.org (as > >> evidenced by their NOTICE). > >> > >> They have copied (some of) the Jar files that come from this into their > >> lib/ directories (xbean.jar, jsr173_1.0_api.jar). > >> > >> The maven repo entry > >> > >> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/xmlbeans/xmlbeans/2.4.0/xmlbeans-2.4.0.pom > >> lists a dependency > >> > >> <dependency> > >> <groupId>stax</groupId> > >> <artifactId>stax-api</artifactId> > >> <version>1.0.1</version> > >> </dependency> > >> > >> In the maven repository, this is listed as an Apache-licensed Jar, and I > >> have read on the web (must be right :-) ) that this is a substitute > >> which could be used instead of the jsr173_1.0_api. > >> > >> If I switch things in the Sandbox to obtain jar parts that are > >> dependencies from the Maven repo system, instead of taking them from our > >> lib/ directories, this change will result in having the above 2 projects > >> get the xbean jar (as before) at version 2.4.0 and the stax_api jar > >> version 1.0.1 instead of the jsr173_1.0_api. > >> > >> Is this OK? > >> > >> -Marshall (who is quite confused by the existence of all these > >> alternative ways of putting parts together...) > >> > > >
