[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762270#action_12762270
 ] 

Jerry Cwiklik commented on UIMA-1593:
-------------------------------------

Fixed UIMA AS Primitive controller to check if multiple instances of AE are 
allowed. The code throws ResourceInitializationException if the AE descriptor's 
operational properties are configured to prevent scale-out but the deployment 
descriptor scaleout parameter is > 1.

> AEs that declare multipleDeploymentAllowed=false can't be deployed as 
> services and called from multiple clients in the same JVM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-1593
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1593
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Async Scaleout, Core Java Framework
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.2
>            Reporter: Adam Lally
>
> If an AnalysisEngine descriptor declares multipleDeploymentAllowed=false, the 
> intention is that there cannot be multiple instances of it in the same JVM.  
> UIMA reports an error if you try to embed such an AE in an aggregate that 
> declares multipleDeploymentAllowed=true.  But this only makes sense for 
> co-located components, not services.
> Currently, the service wrapper returns the multipleDeploymentAllowed=false as 
> part of the getMetaData() call.   The aggregate AE checks this metadata for 
> consistency, and at that point it isn't aware that it came from a service, so 
> the exception is thrown.
> Perhaps the service wrapper should be modified to set 
> mutlipleDeploymentAllowed to true when responding to all getMetaData() calls? 
>  Alternatively it could be done on the client side, but to me it makes more 
> sense for the service to do it - why expose this setting if clients have no 
> use for it?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to