Hi Paul

a Mikrotik ROS system running on x86 Harware is hard to beat for  price and
scale that you are talking about, we have a client running PPPoE in
Germanny with  5K clients per MT PPPoE Service Router...  works well,

as Mick Says an asr 1K would be bullet proof on stability if you have
cash... :)



On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Paul Bone <paul.b...@bridgefibre.co.uk>
wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
>
>
> We have recently inherited a WISP network which is running PPPoE on a
> Ubiquiti Edgemax router and individual rate limits are applied to the
> dynamic PPPoE interfaces using Linux TC from Radius AV-pairs.
>
>
>
> This appears to work ok, but there are currently only around 80
> subscribers, and all subscriber routers are in the same VLAN.
>
>
>
> Can anyone advise on a cost-effective robust PPPoE server solution that
> will support up to 1000 subscribers and allow rate limits to be assigned by
> Radius?
>
>
>
> Is there a recommended limit to the number of PPPoE subscribers within a
> VLAN?
>
>
>
> Many thanks, Paul
>



-- 
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth

Mobile: +353 87 6193172
---------------------------------
PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL
This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged.
The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
named above.  If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please notify me by telephone or by electronic mail
immediately. Any opinions expressed are those of the author, not the
company's  .This email does not constitute either offer or acceptance of
any contractually binding agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be
communicated in
writing. You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening
any attachment. Thomas Smyth accepts no liability for any loss or damage
which may be caused by malicious software or attachments.

Reply via email to