> On 5 Jan 2017, at 14:41, Pete Stevens <p...@ex-parrot.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Paul Mansfield wrote: > >> Someone should set up appropriate logging for the upcoming UKNOF >> meeting to measure the balance of traffic between IPv4 and IPv6, and >> see whether we're all practising what we're preaching ;-) > > A second ESSID with v6 + NAT64 and no v4 gets my vote. Especially if it > gets priority over the dual stack network.
This topic has come up at other networking technical meetings, like IETF and RIPE meetings. The tradeoff is our ability to “eat our own dog food” vs being able to get work done. So far, the IETF has kept the main SSID as is. Not sure what RIPE meetings currently do. Adding a NAT64 SSID, say uknof64, and advertising clearly in the meeting intro, would be great. Making it the default uknof SSID might then follow later. Tim
