On 20 March 2017 at 17:01, Mike Jenkins <mike.jenk...@poundbury.com> wrote: >> > Why not have the copper SFP as a default, >> >> Why not have fibre as default? - Seriously though, this is document in the >> SIN >> documents, so for future reference, RTFM. >> >> "The client interface consists of a RJ-45 type socket for 10 Mbit/s and 100 >> Mbit/s EAD services or dual LC sockets for 1000 Mbit/s EAD services." - >> http://www.btplc.com/sinet/SINs/pdf/492v1p8.pdf - Section >> 4.2 Connector. >> > > But the OP ordered his service from SSE - so there's a definite possibility > that their ordering process let him (incorrectly) order a copper gig > presentation....
If the OP is informed when quoting/ordering the circuit with the carrier that the tail is coming from OR > read the SIN doc. When ordering a circuit with a carrier and the B end is off-net for the carrier (which it sounds like it was), ask the carrier "Who's providing the tails for this service? OR you say!" > read the SIN doc. When ordering a circuit with a carrier and it is not explicity stated that the circuit is on-net or that existing fibre will be used, ask the carrier "Who's providing the tails for this service? OR you say!" > read the SIN doc. Cheers, James.
