Thanks Tom Yes could be MAP-T. When I last trialled IPv6 only access networks, 464XLAT broke less things than the other options I had available at the time!
Paul Paul Bone Director & Network Consultant 07803 570805 ________________________________ From: Tom Hill <t...@ninjabadger.net> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 9:01:31 PM To: Paul Bone <paul.b...@probitas-solutions.tech> Cc: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk <uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk> Subject: Re: [uknof] 464XLAT CPE Hi Paul, On 2022-10-24 14:48, Paul Bone wrote: > I last looked at using 464XLAT two years ago, but there were very few > CPE options. A quick hunt around the internet has kind of suggested > this still to be the case. > > Is anyone out there using 464XLAT in anger and if so which CPE? Does it need to be 464XLAT? MAP-T is gaining some momentum in the fixed-line space. Alas, I've not looked at COTS CPE support for a while. Tom
