Hi Janak Thanks for the clarification.
Regards, Etienne > -----Original Message----- > From: Janak Mulani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 10:48 PM > To: Etienne Studer > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com > Subject: RE: [ULC-developer] markUncollectable() > > Hi Etienne, > > > If this proxy does not have a callback from the client then it is not > necessary to mark it as uncollactable. > > In any case you will have a reference to the proxy when you are invoking > the > one-time call to client and subsequent to that call it is ok for that > proxy > to be collected. > > I hope this helps. > > Thanks and regards, > > Janak > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Etienne Studer > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 6:20 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com > Subject: [ULC-developer] markUncollectable() > > > Hi > > If a implement a ULCProxy sub-class to forward a one-time call to the > client-side, do I still have to mark the proxy instance as uncollectable? > > public class MyExtension extends ULCProxy { > public void doOneTimeClientStuff(ULCList inList) { > upload(); > markUncollectable(); > > Anything anything = new Anything(); > anything.put("listRef", inList.getRef()); > sendUI("doOneTimeStuff", anything); > } > > Thanks for the clarification. > > Regards, Etienne > _______________________________________________ ULC-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
