Hi Martin, Can you send me your custom client class? If not the whole jar, just a jar containing the class?
You may try one more thing: add the jar to the classpath in the lax file i.e. lax.class.path Thanks and regards, Janak ----------------------------------------- Janak Mulani email: [email protected] url: http://www.canoo.com Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications http://www.canoo.com/ulc ----------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 1:47 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider > > Hi Janak, > thank you so much for helping. > The jar holding 'MyClientCoderRegistryProvider' is in the > Library path. > > I looked at the lax - file. There it referes to the jre > included in version 6.2.2 which is of version 1.4.xxx. So i > tried to replace that entry refering to my jre which is > 1.6.0_13, but that did not work either. > > In ULC Load 3.0.2 UI.lax I put > lax.nl.current.vm=C:\\Programme\\Java\\jre1.6.0_13\\bin\\java.exe > > Everything else you mentioned has been provided. > What else would you suggest? > Best regards > Martin > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von > Janak Mulani > Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 12:12 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder registry provider > > Hi Martin, > > ULCLoad 3.0.2 requires ULC 6.2.2 or higher. > > This means that in the ui/lib dir of ULCLoad you should have > client side > jars ulc-applet-client.jar, ulc-base-client.jar, > ulc-base-trusted.jar and > ulc-servlet-client.jar from ULC 6.2.2 or higher. > > You must ensure that version of ULC used by ULCLoad is the same as the > version of ULC used be the ULC Application on the server > which is going to > be load tested. > > Now the question of choosing the custom client coder registry > provider: > > To be able to choose a custom client side class (such as > MyClientCoderRegistryProvider extends > DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider) > you need to put the the jar file containing this class in the path of > ULCLoad i.e. choose and include the jar in the Library list on the > Recorder screen. > > It has been reported sometimes that even if the required jar > is included > in the classpath library list, the combobox for client coder registry > still does not show the custom client coder registry class > for selection. > > I just tested this with ULCLoad 3.0.2 running with ULC 6.2.2 > and ULC 2008 > u4. In both the cases I was able to select the custom client > side class > that was compiled with combinations of {ULC 6.2.2, ULC 2008, > ULC 2008 u3} > and {Java 5, Java 6}. > > However as I said earlier this issue has been reported > before. So you must > ensure that: > > 1. the custom client side class is compiled with same version > of ULC that > is being used by ULCLoad and the ULCApp. > 2. ULCLoad is running with the same Java version (see > xxxUI.lax file in > bin dir) as the one with which the custom client class was compiled. > > Thanks and regards, > > Janak > > ----------------------------------------- > Janak Mulani > > email: [email protected] > url: http://www.canoo.com > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > ----------------------------------------- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 8:01 AM > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > registry provider > > > > Hi Janak, > > the classes on the serverside are compiled with java 1.6, the > > ones on the client with java 1.6 target 1.5 > > the ULC version used ist 6.2.3 > > could you please name the version of ULCLoad that suits? > > many thanks in advance > > regards > > martin > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von > > Janak Mulani > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2010 09:01 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > registry provider > > > > Hi John, Martin, > > > > There are 2 dependencies: > > > > 1. The ULC version used by ULCLoad (the ULC client side jars > > that you have > > in your ui/lib dir) has to be the same as that used by the > > ULC App running > > on the server. This is a given, otherwise, you will run into version > > mismatch while recording and playing. This means the ULC client side > > extension classes must be compiled with the same version of ULC. > > > > 2. The Java version used for compiling the classes must also > > be the same > > (this has been the observed behavior). > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Janak > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > Janak Mulani > > > > email: [email protected] > > url: http://www.canoo.com > > > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > > Prince John, Bedag > > > Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:10 AM > > > To: [email protected]; Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > Subject: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > registry provider > > > > > > Hi Martin, Janak, > > > > > > I don't think this compiler requirement can be right. I ran > > > two of our apps the other day under ULC Load with custom > > > Coder Registry Providers, both compiled with java 6 (though > > > target and source 1.5). > > > > > > I could only load the provider when I installed ULC load with > > > the same version of ulc as used in the application, though (I > > > had to install ulcload twice, once for 2008u4 and once for > > > 6.2.3). Might that be the problem? > > > > > > Best wishes > > > > > > John > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > > Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 5:17 PM > > > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > > > Subject: AW: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > registry provider > > > > > > Hi Janak, > > > thank you so much for answering. Alas I'm puzzled: A collegue > > > of mine is testing the same software. He uses ulcload on > > > ubuntu where he is able to select the custom coder provider. > > > The provider is compiled with java 1.6 target 1.5 and he uses > > > ulcload 3.0.1 (I tried the same scenario under windows and > > it failed). > > > Greetings > > > Martin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > Von: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von > > > Janak Mulani > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 08:59 > > > An: [email protected] > > > Betreff: RE: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > registry provider > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > > Not a matter of luck but somehow your mail from 04.02 did not > > > get posted > > > on the developer list! > > > > > > >>> > > > As I have to test an third party application that provides a > > > custom client coder registry provider I added on the > > > ULCRecoder all given > > > jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a > > custom class > > > which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. > > Unfortunately the > > > custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the > > > Client Coder > > > Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu > > > and there it > > > worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As > > > this prevents > > > from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information > > > that would > > > lead to overcome that frustrating effect. > > > >>> > > > > > > To be able to select coder provider it must be compiled > > with the same > > > javac as that of ULC i.e. Java 1.4. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > > > Janak > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > Janak Mulani > > > > > > email: [email protected] > > > url: http://www.canoo.com <http://www.canoo.com/> > > > > > > Beyond AJAX - Java Rich Internet Applications > > > > > > http://www.canoo.com/ulc > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Sturzenegger > > > Martin DFR IT AG > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:03 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [ULC-developer] AW: custom client coder > > > registry provider > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > unluckily I didn't get any response. Does that mean, that nobody > > > ever encountered that problem or does that mean nobody cares? > > > > > > I'd just love to know > > > > > > best regards > > > > > > m. > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > Von: Sturzenegger Martin DFR IT AG > > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2010 09:58 > > > An: '[email protected]' > > > Betreff: custom client coder registry provider > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > just downloaded evolution copies of ulc-2008-u4 and > > > ulcload-3.0.2 > > > and installed them on windows xp. It went smoothly and > > ulcload starts > > > without any problems. > > > > > > As I have to test an third party application that provides a > > > custom client coder registry provider I added on the > > > ULCRecoder all given > > > jars to the classpath including the one jar containing a > > custom class > > > which subclasses DefaultClientCoderRegistryProvider. > > Unfortunately the > > > custom client coder registry provider does not show up in the > > > Client Coder > > > Registry Provider picklist. With 3.0.1 I tried that on ubuntu > > > and there it > > > worked but under xp it didn't using identical class-libs. As > > > this prevents > > > from getting started, I appreaciate any piece of information > > > that would > > > lead to overcome that frustrating effect. > > > > > > best regards > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > > > > > martin sturzenegger > > > > > > 062 835 10 07 > > > > > > 079 456 24 94 > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ULC-developer mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ULC-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > _______________________________________________ > > ULC-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > > > _______________________________________________ > ULC-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > _______________________________________________ > ULC-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer > _______________________________________________ ULC-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/ulc-developer
