"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:07:43 -0300 > Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > > So, either the dependencies have to get fixed so floppy can't be modular > > for this architecture, or the relevant functions have to move from entry.S > > to the module. > I think the former is the best solution. The assembler code really > needs to get at floppy.c symbols. >From my cursory look the stuff depending on the floppy.c symbols is just in the floppy-related code. Can't that be just included in floppy.c? (Could be quite a mess, but it looks like short stretches). -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ultralinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
