What if we divide this into two categories? Big distros and distros
that need support (if resources permit). 

Mirror big distros: fedora, ubuntu, debian, gentoo
Mirror developing distros: arch, puppy, xandros and so on[1]. 

If we can mirror no more than 2-3 distros, I would like to see
developing distros' mirrors instead of the all-stars. Big ones don't
need much help at this point. 

Mehmet.

[1] I keep pushing Xandros because I bought an eee pc :)))

On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:21:47 -0500
brian raszap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> i think that gentoo and fedora along with debian would be a great
> combination.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:10 PM, Neil Sikka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > We should have gentoo ebuilds and Fedora RPMS.
> >
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 6:42 PM, brian raszap
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > ubuntu - proprietary Launchpad...that would be interesting
> > > >
> > > > maybe we should have a database of different pronunciations of
> > > > ubuntu.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 12, 2008 5:26 PM, Derek Juba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think now they call it Ubuntu.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Derek
> > > > >
> > > > > Bernie Hackett wrote:
> > > > > > <flame retardant undergarments = 100%>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Debian still exists?!?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Feb 12, 2008 4:58 PM, brian raszap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> i think if we mirror a distro it should be Debian. if we
> > > > > >> mirror
> > > > > more than
> > > > > >> one then Debian should be one of those.
> > > > > >> the best idea seems to be torrents for the actual distro
> > > > > >> and
> > > > > mirrors only
> > > > > >> for the packages...
> > > > > >> ~Brian
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Feb 11, 2008 5:07 PM, Neil Sikka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Hey. it sounds like a cool idea for us to mirror distros.
> > > > > >>> it
> > > > > also sounds
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> cool to have Maryland mirroring packages like ebuilds for
> > > > > >> gentoo
> > > > > or rpms for
> > > > > >> Fedora etc. I would definitely use it. Why does the
> > > > > >> business
> > > > > school mirror
> > > > > >> linux????
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Nick Cummings
> > > > > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> I would definitely use mirrors of CD images for Ubuntu
> > > > > >>>> if there
> > > > > were
> > > > > >>>> some hosted by the UMLUG, as things can get quite bogged
> > > > > >>>> down
> > > > > around
> > > > > >>>> release.  In recent times I've just used the torrents to
> > > > > download
> > > > > >>>> images, but sometimes if can be hard to even get those,
> > > > > >>>> so if
> > > > > nothing
> > > > > >>>> else it would actually be helpful if we could just
> > > > > >>>> mirror the
> > > > > torrent
> > > > > >>>> files (which are, obviously, small).
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> The other thing that can get bogged down is updates from
> > > > > >>>> the
> > > > > repository
> > > > > >>>> when a significant number of package updates are
> > > > > >>>> available at
> > > > > once.
> > > > > >>>> While I realize that hosting a repository would take a
> > > > > >>>> lot of
> > > > > space,
> > > > > >>>> might it be possible and useful to host only the updates
> > > > > >>>> or
> > > > > security
> > > > > >>>> repository mirror with only more modest requirements?
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Just a few ideas,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Nick
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> Ken Tossell wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> Hi UMLUG,
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I'm sure some of you know the LUG used to maintain a
> > > > > >>>>> mirror
> > > > > for
> > > > > >>>>> various distributions on AFS. Unfortunately, it was last
> > > > > updated in
> > > > > >>>>> May 2004, with Fedora Core 2.
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> I'd like to get it going again. I've started pulling
> > > > > >>>>> down a
> > > > > few
> > > > > >>>>> distributions' CD/DVD archives, but I'd like to know
> > > > > >>>>> how much interest you all have in a local mirror, so:
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> - Do you think we should operate a distribution mirror?
> > > > > >>>>> Would
> > > > > you use
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> it?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>>> - Should we mirror just CD/DVD images or also host
> > > > > >>>>> package
> > > > > archives?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> (This
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>>> means a lot of space, but we have it.)
> > > > > >>>>> - What distributions, if any, should the mirror have?
> > > > > >>>>> (The
> > > > > business
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> school
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>>> already mirrors CentOS.)
> > > > > >>>>> - Should this mirror be accessible from off the campus
> > > > > >>>>> (with
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> restrictions,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>>> such as only allowing UMD users, and depending on the
> > > > > university's
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >> OK)?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>>> - Other projects?
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>> - Ken
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Neil Sikka
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Neil Sikka
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Neil Sikka

Reply via email to