Thanks, but in fact (I probably should have stated more explicitly)
Windows is the one OS we don't care about, out of the big three.

Regards,

Nick

Neil Sikka wrote:
> hey. we were dealing with this issue of network linux permissions at
> work. We needed a network location to boot off of, so we used NFS. In
> order to boot off a partition, you DEFINITELY need to have the correct
> linux permissions in place(ie you cant boot linux off fat or ntfs). we
> used NFS and were able to boot off of it. So, it definately provides a
> network location with linux style permissions. heres BNFS client for
> windows:
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324055
>
> Overall, im pretty sure NFS will let you have linux permissions AND
> windows access all on a netork location. I dont know anything about
> Mac so i cant help u there.
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:24 PM, P Purkayastha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Nick Cummings wrote:
>
>         As I mentioned a while back, I have a LAN at home with a couple of
>         computers on it and want a convenient way to share files,
>         mainly so we
>         can put our music on a centralized file server and listen to
>         it from any
>         computer in the house.  The only computers I care about
>         connecting are
>         running Ubuntu or OS X.  I'd certainly like to be able to
>         limit who on
>         the LAN can access the files, and I'd prefer to also find
>         something that
>         would support the Unix file permissions on the disk.  What's
>         the best
>         way to share these files?
>         I've used Samba for this in the past, which worked okay, but
>         is a little
>         weird with permissions due to its Windows origins.  That was an
>         acceptable solution, but not ideal, and I ended up spending
>         some time
>         fine-tuning the smb.conf file.  Maybe NFS is a better option?
>          Or can
>         WebDAV be used for this reasonably (I asked about this
>         possibility in
>         the past)?  As I said, Samba was a little bit of a pain to get
>         working
>         the way I wanted.  Is there a better solution or an equally
>         good but
>         especially easy solution?
>
>         Thanks for suggestions,
>
>         Nick
>
>
>
>          
>
>     fuse+sshfs may be a nice way of "transparently" using the files. A
>     google search shows that fuse+sshfs is available on Mac too.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Neil Sikka


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to